Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 18.

Published in final edited form as: Math Program Comput. 2015 Feb 6;7(2):149–187. doi: 10.1007/s12532-015-0078-2

Table 4.

Numerical comparison of the averaged performance between Algorithm 3 and ADMM²

		Alg. 3 (α = 1)	Alg. 3 (α = 1.9)	ADMM²
Scheme 1	CPU time(s)	215.12	154.7	1045.62
	Objective Value	60.6777	60.6821	60.8028
	Violation	0.0048	0.0050	0.1464

Scheme 2	CPU time(s)	213.80	147.29	1184.98
	Objective Value	54.7704	54.7729	54.7915
	Violation	0.0049	0.0052	0.1773

Scheme 3	CPU time(s)	613.20	462.41	5514.81
	Objective Value	124.0258	124.0208	124.2314
	Violation	0.0072	0.0072	0.2361

Scheme 4	CPU time(s)	607.80	463.58	5357.55
	Objective Value	111.8513	111.8489	112.0675
	Violation	0.0072	0.0071	0.2137