Table 3.

The 15 genera with significantly different abundance in the rumen of goats fed at a completed feed (CF) or all forage (AF) diet¹⁾

Phylum	Genus	Log-transformed proportion values		p value
		CF	AF
Firmicutes	Lachnospiracea_incertae_sedis	−0.222)± −0.593)	0.89±0.50	0.000
	Anaerovibrio	−1.10±−1.40	−2.83±−2.44	0.002
	Flavonifractor	−0.04±−2.23	−3.16±−2.77	0.007
	(Phylum) Firmicutes	0.16±−0.11	0.50±0.04	0.013
	Eubacterium	04)	−2.38±−2.43	0.021
	Ruminococcus	0.14±0.27	0.53±0.29	0.031
Proteobacteria	(Family) Enterobacteriaceae (other)	0.10±−0.12	−1.10±−1.22	0.038
	Sphingomonas	−2.14±−1.91	−1.56±−1.87	0.023
	(Family)Comamonadaceae	−3.13±−2.74	−2.31±−2.48	0.022
	Pseudomonas	−0.11±−0.08	−1.10±−1.40	0.000
	(Family)Enterobacteriaceae (unlassfied)	−1.72±−1.82	−2.48±−2.28	0.003
	Enterobacter	−1.94±−2.01	−2.75±−2.51	0.044
Tenericutes	Anaeroplasma	−0.08±−0.50	−0.51±−0.54	0.041
Verrucomicrobia	(Family)Verrucomicrobiaceae	−3.13±−2.74	−1.68±−1.75	0.036
Euryarchaeota	Methanimicrococcus	−7.71±−1.68	0	0.047

¹⁾The taxa that couldn’t be assigned a genus but were still significant different at p<0.05 using t-test analysis were displayed using the highest taxonomic level that could be assigned to them and the level is shown in parentheses.

²⁾Log-transformed proportion values of the average value of each sample.

³⁾Log-transformed proportion values of the standard deviation value of each sample.

⁴⁾Not detected.