Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 19;8:603. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00603

Table 2.

Persistence measures by Implementation Intention Referent and Task Communication (Experiment 2).

Implementation Intention Referent

Individual (II) Collective (cII)


Measure Communication hindered Communication supported Communication hindered Communication supported
Manipulation check: number of words spoken

Baseline 1.43 (3.37) 21.96 (12.33) 2.78 (5.69) 29.60 (24.62)
[-0.98; 3.84] [12.49; 31.44] [-1.60; 7.15] [11.99; 47.21]
Experimental 0.00 (n/a) [n/a] 12.78 (10.42) 0.00 (n/a) [n/a] 17.77 (13.07)
[4.77; 20.79] [8.42; 27.11]

Persistence

Baseline (s) 118.90 (43.24) 190.11 (60.43) 134.22 (57.63) 154.50 (44.17)
[87.97; 149.83] [143.66; 236.57] [89.93; 178.52] [122.90; 186.10]
Experimental (s) 120.00 (61.10) 139.22 (37.47) 97.22 (28.28) 132.20 (51.37)
[76.29; 163.71] [110.42; 168.02] [75.49; 118.96] [95.45; 168.95]
Difference 1.10 (42.37) -50.89 (48.60) -37.00 (34.97) -22.30 (25.86)
[-29.21; 31.41] [-88.25; -13.53] [-63.88; -10.12] [-40.80; -3.80]
Difference z-transformed per communication condition (dependent measure) 1.84 (4.32) -1.64 (5.30) -2.05 (3.57) 1.48 (2.82)
[-1.25; 4.93] [-5.72; 2.43] [-4.79; 0.70] [-0.54; 3.49]
n 10 triads 9 triads 9 triads 10 triads

Standard deviations are in parentheses and 95% confidence intervals of the condition mean are in brackets.