Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 18;37(5):58. doi: 10.1007/s11032-017-0664-2

Table 2.

Overview of mapped QTLs

Trait QTL Composite interval mapping (CIM)
Positiona Closest SNP LOD a d R 2 (%)
PV qPV11 11@19.4 solcap_snp_sl_36066 17.6 9.1 −3.3 36.3
PN qPN7 7@134.7 solcap_snp_sl_12139 8.0 −2.4 0.3 18.6
SP qSP1 1@16 solcap_snp_sl_8704 8.5 0.3 0.1 19.5
qSP3 3@80.4 solcap_snp_sl_7942 12.9 0.4 0.2 28.0
AL qAL1 1@70 solcap_snp_sl_42213 6.6 0.3 0.0 15.5
qAL2 2@80.8 solcap_snp_sl_36287 4.8 −0.2 0.0 11.6
qAL7 7@134.7 solcap_snp_sl_12139 11.3 −0.3 0.1 25.2
SL qSL1 1@16 solcap_snp_sl_8704 10.1 0.4 0.0 22.7
qSL2 2@80.8 solcap_snp_sl_36287 4.3 −0.3 0.0 10.5
qSL3 3@75.8 solcap_snp_sl_7942 6.7 0.3 0.3 15.8
FPI qFPI1 1@40 solcap_snp_sl_13762 19.1 0.7 0.0 38.7
IN qIN1 1@39 solcap_snp_sl_13762 9.7 2.1 0.2 21.9
qIN8 8@95.3 solcap_snp_sl_15446 5.6 1.7 0.8 13.4

PV pollen viability, PN pollen number, SP style protrusion, AL anther length, SL style length, FPI flowers per inflorescence, IN inflorescence number, a additive effect (positive value indicates a positive effect from Nagcarlang, negative value indicates a positive effect from NCHS-1), d dominance effect

aPostition is presented as chromosome@genetic position