Skip to main content
Integrative Medicine Research logoLink to Integrative Medicine Research
. 2017 Jan 10;6(1):12–18. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2016.12.001

Cryopreservation and its clinical applications

Tae Hoon Jang a,1, Sung Choel Park a,1, Ji Hyun Yang a, Jung Yoon Kim a, Jae Hong Seok a, Ui Seo Park a, Chang Won Choi a, Sung Ryul Lee b,, Jin Han b,
PMCID: PMC5395684  PMID: 28462139

Abstract

Cryopreservation is a process that preserves organelles, cells, tissues, or any other biological constructs by cooling the samples to very low temperatures. The responses of living cells to ice formation are of theoretical interest and practical relevance. Stem cells and other viable tissues, which have great potential for use in basic research as well as for many medical applications, cannot be stored with simple cooling or freezing for a long time because ice crystal formation, osmotic shock, and membrane damage during freezing and thawing will cause cell death. The successful cryopreservation of cells and tissues has been gradually increasing in recent years, with the use of cryoprotective agents and temperature control equipment. Continuous understanding of the physical and chemical properties that occur in the freezing and thawing cycle will be necessary for the successful cryopreservation of cells or tissues and their clinical applications. In this review, we briefly address representative cryopreservation processes, such as slow freezing and vitrification, and the available cryoprotective agents. In addition, some adverse effects of cryopreservation are mentioned.

Keywords: cryoinjury, cryopreservation, cryoprotective agent, slow freezing, vitrification

1. Introduction

Biological and chemical reactions in living cells are dramatically reduced at low temperature, a phenomenon that can lead to the possible long-term preservation of cells and tissues. However, freezing is fatal to most living organisms, since both intra- and extracellular ice crystals are formed and results in changes to the chemical setting of cells that lead to cellular mechanical constraints and injury.1 The major hurdle for cells to overcome at low temperatures is the water-to-ice phase transition.2, 3 Cell injury at fast cooling rates is attributed to intracellular ice formation, whereas slow cooling causes osmotic changes due to the effects of exposure to highly concentrated intra- and extracellular solutions or to mechanical interactions between cells and the extracellular ice (Fig. 1). Cryopreservation is a process that maintains biological samples in a state of suspended animation at cryogenic temperature for any considerable period and is used to preserve the fine structure of cells.3, 4 The freezing behavior of the cells can be altered in the presence of a cryoprotective agent (CPA; also called cryoprotectant), which affects the rates of water transport, nucleation, and ice crystal growth. Numerous research papers on cryopreservation have studied the underlying physical and biological factors affecting the survival of cells at low temperatures during the cooling and warming processes.5 Unlike in single cell suspensions, bulk tissues have different heat and mass transfer effects that occur during the cryopreservation of bulk tissues and thus these factors make it more difficult to achieve rapid cooling and warming rates as well as an equal distribution of CPAs.1, 6 Cryopreserved cells or tissues possess some advantages for basic research and current and future clinical applications. With the constant availability of cryopreserved cells and tissues, extensive quality testing can be performed to determine the suitability of the cells or tissue for transplantation without the need to obtain fresh samples.7 The successful cryopreservation of cells and tissues has been gradually increasing in recent years with the use of CPAs and temperature control equipment (Table 1). In this review, we briefly summarize the principles of cryopreservation and its application in clinical areas.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Physical events and cryoinjury of cells during freezing and thawing. Cryoinjuries are caused, at least in part, by the solution effect (leading to osmotic shock) and intracellular ice formation (leading to breakdown of intracellular structures).

CPA, cryoprotective agent.

Table 1.

Comparison between the slow-freezing and vitrification methods

Characteristic Procedure
Slow freezing Vitrification
Working time More than 3 h Fast, less than 10 min
Cost Expensive, freezing machine needed Inexpensive, no special machine needed
Sample volume (μL) 100–250 1–2
Concentration of CPA Low High
Risk of freeze injury, including ice crystal formation High Low
Post-thaw viability High High
Risk of toxicity of CPA Low High
Status of system Closed system only Opened or closed system
Potential contamination with pathogenic agents Low High
Manipulation skill Easy Difficult

CPA, cryoprotective agent.

2. Cryopreservation

2.1. Cryopreservation procedure

Cryopreservation is the use of very low temperatures to preserve structurally intact living cells and tissues for a long period of time.2 Depending on the cell types or given cells among different mammalian species, there is great diversity in cryobiological response and cryosurvival during the freezing and thawing cycle (Fig. 1 and Table 1).5 Cryopreservation processes can generally be grouped into the following types: (1) slow freezing8, 9; (2) vitrification, which involves the solidification of the aqueous milieu of the cell or tissue into a noncrystalline glassy phase10; (3) subzero nonfreezing storage; and (4) preservation in the dry state.11 Generally, the storage of mammalian cells in the dry state is not readily possible because of difficulties in introducing the disaccharide trehalose (disaccharide of glucose, 342 Da)12 and amino acids (used as preservatives in plants) into the intracellular region.13 The major steps in cryopreservation are (1): the mixing of CPAs with cells or tissues before cooling; (2) cooling of the cells or tissues to a low temperature and its storage; (3) warming of the cells or tissues; and (4) removal of CPAs from the cells or tissues after thawing.14 The appropriate use of CPAs is therefore important to improve the viability of the sample to be cryopreserved.

2.2. Cryoinjury

The exact mechanism of cryoinjury, which is the damage of cells associated with the phase changes of water in both extra- and intracellular environments at low temperatures, has not been clearly established.5 The cooling and thawing velocities can largely affect the physicochemical and biophysical reactions, altering the survival rate. Cryoinjury mechanisms involving osmotic rupture caused by extra- or intracellularly concentrated solutes and intracellular ice formation have been highly suggested,15, 16, 17 both processes of which are dependent on the cooling rate (Fig. 1).5, 18 In addition, cell viability limits are defined primarily in terms of an intact plasma membrane that retains normal semipermeable properties. Indeed, conditions that allow the plasma membrane to survive may not allow the survival of critical organelles within cells.5

2.3. CPAs

The CPA, which is usually a fluid, reduces the freezing injury from the cryopreservation process (Fig. 1). CPAs should be biologically acceptable, be able to penetrate the cells, and have low toxicity.2 Various CPAs have been developed (Table 2) and are used to reduce the amount of ice formed at any given temperature, depending on the cell type, cooling rate, and warming rate.2 In order to achieve the best survival rate of cells and tissues, the sample volume, cooling rate, warming rate, and CPA concentrations should be optimized depending on the different cell types and context of tissues.18 It should be mentioned that the macroscopic physical dimension of the tissue is a major point to be defined in a cryopreservation protocol because of heat and mass transfer limitations in these bulk systems.1, 18 CPAs can be divided into two categories: (1) cell membrane-permeating cryoprotectants, such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), glycerol,19 and 1,2-propanediol; and (2) nonmembrane-permeating cryoprotectants, such as 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol and polymers such as polyvinyl pyrrolidone, hydroxyethyl starch, and various sugars.1, 4 Unlike synthetic chemicals, biomaterials such as alginates, polyvinyl alcohol, and chitosan can be used to impede ice crystal growth, along with traditional small molecules.4 The direct inhibition of ice crystal formation and application of antioxidants and other compounds have been used to attempt to reduce cell death from processes such as apoptosis during the freezing and thawing cycle.20, 21, 22, 23 Common CPAs are briefly addressed in the following subsections and Table 2.

Table 2.

Commonly used cryoprotective agents and their uses

Cryoprotective agents Membrane permeability Possible toxicity30 Applied in cryopreservation
Cell Banker series Yes Unknown but less than that of DMSO Adipose tissue-derived stem cells29
Amniotic fluid
Bone marrow36
Mammalian cells
Synovium36
Dimethylsulfoxide
(DMSO)
Yes Reduction in heart rate
Toxicity to cell membrane
Adipocyte tissue36
Amniotic fluid and umbilical cord36
Bone marrow36
Dental pulp36
Embryo (combined with EG or propylene glycol)44
Embryonic stem cells (alone or combined with EG)37
Hepatocytes11
Microorganisms26
Oocyte (combined with EG)37, 45
Platelet27
Teeth36
Testicular cell/tissue
Ethylene glycol (EG) Yes Gastrointestinal irritation
Pulmonary edema
Lung inflammation
Amniotic fluid36
Dental pulp36
Glycerol Yes Renal failure Amniotic fluid
Microorganisms26
Red blood cell37, 38, 39Spermatozoa
Teeth36
Trehalose No Relatively less toxic Adipose-derived stem cells (combined with vitrification)28
Embryo (combined with vitrification)
Ovarian tissue (combined with vitrification)
Red blood cell38
Spermatozoa12
Stem cells (combined with propylene glycol)37
Propylene glycol (1,2-propanediol) Yes Impairment in the developmental potential of mouse zygotes Embryo30, 31
Hepatocytes11

2.3.1. Glycerol

Polge et al24 discovered the cryoprotective effect of glycerol in 1949, and this polyol compound remained the most effective of additives until the protective effect of DMSO was demonstrated by Lovelock and Bishop in 1959.25 Glycerol is a nonelectrolyte and thus may act by reducing the electrolyte concentration in the residual unfrozen solution in and around a cell at any given temperature. It is widely used in the storage of bacteria and animal sperm.26

2.3.2. DMSO

First synthesized by the Russian scientist Alexander Zaytsev in 1866, DMSO has been commonly used for the cryopreservation of cultured mammalian cells because of its low cost and relatively low level of cytotoxicity.25, 27 Like glycerol, DMSO acts by reducing the electrolyte concentration in the residual unfrozen solution in and around a cell at any given temperature. However, a decline in the survival rate and the induction of cell differentiation caused by DNA methylation and histone alteration have been reported.28, 29 These negative effects of DMSO in cryopreservation create some difficulties for its use in routine clinical applications.

2.3.3. Polymers

The entrapment of CPAs within a capsule during cell resuspension in an encapsulating material is another strategy for the modulation of cell location.4 Among encapsulating materials, synthetic nonpenetrating polymers can provide cryoprotection of cells within the scaffold, thereby bypassing the limitations of diffusion in higher-dimensional cryopreservation.4 Vinyl-derived polymers, such as polyethylene glycol (C2nH4n+2On+1, molecular weight: 200–9500 Da), polyvinyl alcohol [(C2H4O)n, molecular weight: 30–70 kDa), and hydroxyethyl starch (130–200 kDa), have a capacity to decrease the size of formed ice crystals.4, 30, 31

2.3.4. Proteins

Sericin is a water-soluble sticky protein (∼30 kDa) isolated from the silkworm cocoon and has been developed as a fetal bovine serum- or DMSO-replacing CPA for human adipose tissue-derived stem or progenitor cells, or hepatocytes.26, 27 Small antifreeze proteins derived from marine teleosts or fishes have also attracted attention as CPAs.32

2.3.5. Cell Banker series

A newly developed Cell Banker series (Nippon Zenyaku Kogyo Co., Ltd., Fukushima, Japan) allows for rapid cell cryopreservation at −80 °C, and has been shown to achieve better survival rates following freezing and thawing.29, 33 The Cell Banker series of cryopreservation media contain 10% DMSO, glucose, a prescribed high polymer, and pH adjustors.33 Serum-containing Cell Bankers 1 and 1+ can be used for the cryopreservation of almost all mammalian cells. Indeed, conventional cryopreservation media include fetal bovine serum, which contains a mixture of growth factors, cytokines, and undefined substances such as bovine exosomes, rendering its use forbidden in the establishment of a standardized cryopreservation protocol for clinical use in humans.34 In this aspect, the nonserum-type Cell Banker 2 is optimal for the cryopreservation of cells in serum-free culture conditions. Cell Banker 3 (or Stem cell Banker) is composed of 10% DMSO and other inorganic compounds (US20130198876) and satisfies the criterion of a chemically defined known ingredient that is xeno free and is thus suitable for the preservation of somatic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells.

3. Freezing method: conventional slow freezing and vitrification

Cryopreservation can be accomplished by slow freezing and vitrification methods (Table 1). The major differences between the two are the concentrations of CPAs and the cooling rates used. Theoretically, if cooling is sufficiently slow, cells could efflux intracellular water rapidly enough to eliminate supercooling and thus prevent intracellular ice formation.5 As a result of differences in the capacity of different cells to move water across the plasma membrane, optimal cooling rates will be dependent on cell types. Slow freezing first substitutes the water within the cytoplasm with CPAs which reduces cell damage and adjusts the cooling rate in accordance with the permeability of the cell membrane. Slow-cooling protocols involve a typical cooling rate of about 1 °C/min in the presence of less than 1.0M of CPA, with use of a high-cost controlled-rate freezer or a benchtop portable freezing container.8, 9 The advantages of slow freezing are that it has a low risk of contamination during the procedures and does not demand high manipulation skills. However, slow freezing has a high risk of freeze injury due to the formation of extracellular ice (Table 1). As an alternative to the slow-freezing technique, vitrification is a process by which cell suspensions are transformed directly from the aqueous phase to a glass state after direct exposure to liquid nitrogen.35 The process requires cooling of the cells or tissues to deep cryogenic temperatures (i.e., with liquid nitrogen) after their exposure to high concentrations of CPA (in the ratio of 40–60%, weight/volume), with subsequent rapid cooling to avoid ice nucleation.18 Vitrification is largely dependent on three factors: (1) viscosity of the sample; (2) cooling and warming rates; and (3) sample volume.18 Thus, a delicate balance must be maintained among all the relevant factors to ensure successful vitrification. There are two methods of vitrification: equilibrium and nonequilibrium. Equilibrium vitrification requires formulation of multimolar CPA mixtures and their injection into the cell suspensions. Nonequilibrium vitrification, which is further divided into carrier-based (including the former plastic straws, quartz microcapillaries, and cryoloops for obtaining a minimum drop volume18) and carrier-free systems, uses an extremely high freezing rate along with lower concentrations of the CPA mixture. A major advantage of vitrification is the low risk of freeze injury, thereby ensuring a sufficiently high cell survival rate. However, the high potential of contamination with pathogenic agents is present, and the technique requires good manipulation skills.

4. Applications of cryopreservation

The applications of cryopreservation (Table 2) can be categorized into the following areas: (1) cryopreservation of cells or organs5; (2) cryosurgery; (3) biochemistry and molecular biology; (4) food sciences; (5) ecology and plant physiology; and (6) many medical applications, such as blood transfusion, bone marrow transplantation, artificial insemination, and in vitro fertilization (IVF).3, 5, 8, 11, 36, 37, 38, 39 Some suggested advantages of cryopreservation include the possible banking of cells for human leukocyte antigen typing for organ transplantation, the allowance of sufficient time for transport of cells and tissues among different medical centers, and the provision of research sources for identifying unknown transmissible diseases or pathogens.5 Furthermore, the long-term storage of stem cells is still the initial step toward tissue engineering, which holds promise for the regeneration of soft tissue esthetic function and for the treatment of known diseases that have currently no therapy option.40

4.1. Oocytes and embryos

The first case of embryo cryopreservation for fertility preservation took place in 1996, with the application of a natural IVF cycle prior to chemotherapy in a woman diagnosed with breast cancer. Cryopreservation of mature oocytes is a proven technique for preserving the reproductive capacity. Results from a retrospective study of 11,768 cryopreserved human embryos that underwent at least one thaw cycle from 1986 to 2007 showed that there was no significant impact of the duration of storage on clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, implantation, or live birth rate, whether from IVF or oocyte donation cycles.41 Since oocytes are highly prone to chilling injury10; cryopreservation of immature oocytes and ovarian tissue is a promising approach-with reports of live births-but the need for investigational improvements remain.37, 42, 43, 44, 45

4.2. Sperm, semen, and testicular tissue

Germ cell depletion caused by chemical or physical toxicity, disease, or genetic predisposition can occur at any age.6 Fertility preservation is of great importance to guarantee the quality of life of patients facing chemo- and radiotherapy.46 Sperm and semen can be used almost indefinitely after proper cryopreservation. There are new trials for cryopreserving testicular tissues in the form of cell suspensions, tubular pieces, and entire gonads,6, 47 but this technique is still premature. Overall, cryopreservation can be used as a first-line means of preserving fertility for men undergoing vasectomy or treatments that may compromise their fertility, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery.

4.3. Stem cells

Adult stem cells are capable of differentiating into multiple types of specific cells and can be obtained from various locations other than bone marrow, including fat tissue, the periosteum, amniotic fluid, and umbilical cord blood.9 Stem cells can be subdivided into embryonic stem cells, mesenchymal stromal cells,29, 36, 48 and hematopoietic stem cells, all of which are considered as goldmines for potential application in regenerative medicine.28, 29, 49, 50 Clearly, the fields of tissue engineering, gene therapy, regenerative medicine, and cell transplantation are largely dependent on the ability to preserve, store, and transport these stem cells without modification of their genetic and/or cellular contents.

4.4. Hepatocytes

Primarily isolated hepatocytes have found important applications in science and medicine over the past 40 years in a wide range of areas, including physiological studies, investigations on liver metabolism, organ preservation and drug detoxification, and experimental and clinical transplantation.7, 11 In addition, there is currently increasing interest in the applications of liver progenitor cells across a range of scientific areas, including both regenerative medicine and biotechnology, which raises the need for cryobanking.11

4.5. Others

Although primary neuronal cells and cardiomyocytes are routinely used for neuroscience and cardiology research, a gold standard protocol for the preservation of these cells has not yet been developed. With the discovery of glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimens,51 pancreatic islet transplantation may be considered as an alternative for the treatment of type 1 diabetes. For this reason, the development of islet cryopreservation methods has been ongoing, but results are still suboptimal, with a survival rate of less than 50%.51

5. Limitations of cryopreservation

Although numerous usages of the cryopreservation technique exist, both in basic and clinical research, some limitations still exist. Cells metabolize almost nothing at low temperatures such as −196 °C (i.e., in liquid nitrogen), which has inevitable side effects, including a genetic drift toward biological variations of cell-associated changes in lipids and proteins that could result in the impairment of cellular activity and structure. If there were no limit to the amount of CPA that could be used, cells would be preserved perfectly.1 In conventional settings, however, CPAs themselves can be damaging to cells, especially when used in high concentrations. For example, there is a possibility that DMSO may alter chromosome stability, which can lead to a risk of tumor formation.52, 53 Apart from endogenous changes in cells, the possible infection or contamination with cells such as tumorous ones should be prevented.

6. Summary and perspectives

Improvements in the freezing and thawing rates, osmotic conditions, choice and concentration of CPAs, and equilibration times in the CPAs might result in better survival and functionality of human tissue and cell samples, permitting their successful future clinical application.6 In this review, the freezing methods (slow freezing vs. vitrification) used in cryopreservation and several CPAs were briefly addressed. New CPAs are constantly being investigated owing to the inherent toxicity of many known agents.4, 30 A better understanding of the chemistry and biology behind freezing and thawing will be necessary for future development of this process and for finding the safest and most effective cryopreservation method. The successful cryopreservation of biological samples may play a pivotal role in research connected with clinical utility for all kinds of human trials. Collectively, the most prominent future goals of cryopreservation should focus on the development of procedures that minimally affect the intactness of cryopreserved cells or tissues, followed by the standardization and optimization of the technique for routine use.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We apologize for the substantial number of outstanding publications that could not be cited because of space limitations. This work is a product of the Course of Medicinal Scientist Development Program, College of Medicine, Inje University. This work was supported by the Priority Research Centers Program (2010-0020224) and the Basic Science Research Program (2015R1A2A1A13001900 and 2015R1D1A3A01015596) through the National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.

Contributor Information

Sung Ryul Lee, Email: lsr1113@inje.ac.kr.

Jin Han, Email: phyhanj@inje.ac.kr.

References

  • 1.Karlsson J.O., Toner M. Long-term storage of tissues by cryopreservation: critical issues. Biomaterials. 1996;17:243–256. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)85562-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pegg D.E. Principles of cryopreservation. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;368:39–57. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-362-2_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mazur P. Cryobiology: the freezing of biological systems. Science. 1970;168:939–949. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3934.939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sambu S. A Bayesian approach to optimizing cryopreservation protocols. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1039. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gao D., Critser J.K. Mechanisms of cryoinjury in living cells. ILAR J. 2000;41:187–196. doi: 10.1093/ilar.41.4.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Onofre J., Baert Y., Faes K., Goossens E. Cryopreservation of testicular tissue or testicular cell suspensions: a pivotal step in fertility preservation. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:744–761. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ibars E.P., Cortes M., Tolosa L., Gómez-Lechón M.J., López S., Castell J.V. Hepatocyte transplantation program: Lessons learned and future strategies. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:874–886. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mandawala A.A., Harvey S.C., Roy T.K., Fowler K.E. Cryopreservation of animal oocytes and embryos: Current progress and future prospects. Theriogenology. 2016;86:1637–1644. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yong K.W., Wan Safwani W.K., Xu F., Wan Abas W.A., Choi J.R., Pingguan-Murphy B. Cryopreservation of human mesenchymal stem cells for clinical applications: current methods and challenges. Biopreserv Biobank. 2015;13:231–239. doi: 10.1089/bio.2014.0104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zeron Y., Pearl M., Borochov A., Arav A. Kinetic and temporal factors influence chilling injury to germinal vesicle and mature bovine oocytes. Cryobiology. 1999;38:35–42. doi: 10.1006/cryo.1998.2139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fuller B.J., Petrenko A.Y., Rodriguez J.V., Somov A.Y., Balaban C.L., Guibert E.E. Biopreservation of hepatocytes: current concepts on hypothermic preservation, cryopreservation, and vitrification. Cryo Letters. 2013;34:432–452. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu J., Tanrikut C., Wright D.L., Lee G.Y., Toner M., Biggers J.D. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa with minimal non-permeable cryoprotectant. Cryobiology. 2016;73:162–167. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2016.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Crowe J.H., Crowe L.M. Preservation of mammalian cells-learning nature's tricks. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18:145–146. doi: 10.1038/72580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gao H.H., Li Z.P., Wang H.P., Zhang L.F., Zhang J.M. Cryopreservation of whole bovine ovaries: comparisons of different thawing protocols. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;204:104–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McGann L.E., Yang H.Y., Walterson M. Manifestations of cell damage after freezing and thawing. Cryobiology. 1988;25:178–185. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(88)90024-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mazur P., Leibo S.P., Chu E.H. A two-factor hypothesis of freezing injury. Evidence from Chinese hamster tissue-culture cells. Exp Cell Res. 1972;71:345–355. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90303-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Toner M., Cravalho E.G., Stachecki J., Fitzgerald T., Tompkins R.G., Yarmush M.L. Nonequilibrium freezing of one-cell mouse embryos. Membrane integrity and developmental potential. Biophys J. 1993;64:1908–1921. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81562-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yavin S., Arav A. Measurement of essential physical properties of vitrification solutions. Theriogenology. 2007;67:81–89. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pegg D.E. The history and principles of cryopreservation. Semin Reprod Med. 2002;20:5–13. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-23515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Safa S., Moghaddam G., Jozani R.J., Daghigh Kia H., Janmohammadi H. Effect of vitamin E and selenium nanoparticles on post-thaw variables and oxidative status of rooster semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 2016;174:100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Krauskova L., Prochazkova J., Klaskova M., Filipová L., Chaloupková R., Malý S. Suppression of protein inactivation during freezing by minimizing pH changes using ionic cryoprotectants. Int J Pharm. 2016;509:41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ha S.J., Kim B.G., Lee Y.A., Kim Y.-H., Kim B.-J., Jung E.-E. Effect of antioxidants and apoptosis inhibitors on cryopreservation of murine germ cells enriched for spermatogonial stem cells. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0161372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Amidi F., Pazhohan A., Shabani Nashtaei M., Khodarahmian M., Nekoonam S. The role of antioxidants in sperm freezing: a review. Cell Tissue Bank. 2016;17:745–756. doi: 10.1007/s10561-016-9566-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Polge C., Smith A.U., Parkes A.S. Revival of spermatozoa after vitrification and dehydration at low temperatures. Nature. 1949;164:666. doi: 10.1038/164666a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lovelock J.E., Bishop M.W. Prevention of freezing damage to living cells by dimethyl sulphoxide. Nature. 1959;183:1394–1395. doi: 10.1038/1831394a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hubalek Z. Protectants used in the cryopreservation of microorganisms. Cryobiology. 2003;46:205–229. doi: 10.1016/s0011-2240(03)00046-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Slichter S.J., Jones M., Ransom J., Gettinger I., Jones M.K., Christoffel T. Review of in vivo studies of dimethyl sulfoxide cryopreserved platelets. Transfus Med Rev. 2014;28:212–225. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2014.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yong K.W., Pingguan-Murphy B., Xu F., Abas W.A., Choi J.R., Omar S.Z. Phenotypic and functional characterization of long-term cryopreserved human adipose-derived stem cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9596. doi: 10.1038/srep09596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Miyagi-Shiohira C., Kurima K., Kobayashi N., Saitoh I., Watanabe M., Noguchi Y. Cryopreservation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Med. 2015;8:3–7. doi: 10.3727/215517915X689100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Best B.P. Cryoprotectant toxicity: facts, issues, and questions. Rejuvenation Res. 2015;18:422–436. doi: 10.1089/rej.2014.1656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fuller B.J., Paynter S.J. Cryopreservation of mammalian embryos. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;368:325–339. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-362-2_23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fletcher G.L., Hew C.L., Davies P.L. Antifreeze proteins of teleost fishes. Annu Rev Physiol. 2001;63:359–390. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.63.1.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Holm F., Ström S., Inzunza J., Baker D., Strömberg A.M., Rozell B. An effective serum- and xeno-free chemically defined freezing procedure for human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1271–1279. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li Y., Tan J.C., Li L.S. Comparison of three methods for cryopreservation of human embryonic stem cells. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:999–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rall W.F., Fahy G.M. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at –196 °C by vitrification. Nature. 1985;313:573–575. doi: 10.1038/313573a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Marquez-Curtis L.A., Janowska-Wieczorek A., McGann L.E., Elliott J.A. Mesenchymal stromal cells derived from various tissues: Biological, clinical and cryopreservation aspects. Cryobiology. 2015;71:181–197. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Asghar W., El Assal R., Shafiee H., Anchan R.M., Demirci U. Preserving human cells for regenerative, reproductive, and transfusion medicine. Biotechnol J. 2014;9:895–903. doi: 10.1002/biot.201300074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Alotaibi N.A., Slater N.K., Rahmoune H. Salidroside as a novel protective agent to improve red blood cell cryopreservation. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0162748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chang A., Kim Y., Hoehn R., Jernigan P., Pritts T. Cryopreserved packed red blood cells in surgical patients: past, present, and future. Blood Transfus. 2016:1–7. doi: 10.2450/2016.0083-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Keck M., Haluza D., Selig H.F., Jahl M., Lumenta D.B., Kamolz L.P. Adipose tissue engineering: three different approaches to seed preadipocytes on a collagen-elastin matrix. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;67:484–488. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822f9946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Riggs R., Mayer J., Dowling-Lacey D., Chi T.F., Jones E., Oehninger S. Does storage time influence postthaw survival and pregnancy outcome? An analysis of 11,768 cryopreserved human embryos. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Demeestere I., Simon P., Dedeken L., Moffa F., Tsépélidis S., Brachet C. Live birth after autograft of ovarian tissue cryopreserved during childhood. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2107–2109. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Borini A., Bianchi V. Cryopreservation of mature and immature oocytes. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53:763–774. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181f96f01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wong K.M., Mastenbroek S., Repping S. Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success rates. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gook D.A. History of oocyte cryopreservation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:281–289. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Thomson A.B., Campbell A.J., Irvine D.C., Anderson R.A., Kelnar C.J., Wallace W.H. Semen quality and spermatozoal DNA integrity in survivors of childhood cancer: a case-control study. Lancet. 2002;360:361–367. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09606-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Unni S., Kasiviswanathan S., D'Souza S., Khavale S., Mukherjee S., Patwardhan S. Efficient cryopreservation of testicular tissue: effect of age, sample state, and concentration of cryoprotectant. Fertil Steril. 2012;97 doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.018. 200–8.e201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ray S.S., Pramanik K., Sarangi S.K., Jain N. Serum-free non-toxic freezing solution for cryopreservation of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Biotechnol Lett. 2016;38:1397–1404. doi: 10.1007/s10529-016-2111-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Caplan A.I., West M.D. Progressive approval: a proposal for a new regulatory pathway for regenerative medicine. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2014;3:560–563. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2013-0180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Maslova O., Novak M., Kruzliak P. Umbilical cord tissue-derived cells as therapeutic agents. Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015:150609. doi: 10.1155/2015/150609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Taylor M.J., Baicu S. Review of vitreous islet cryopreservation: Some practical issues and their resolution. Organogenesis. 2009;5:155–166. doi: 10.4161/org.5.3.9812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jenkins E.C., Ye L., Silverman W.P. Does the cryogenic freezing process cause shorter telomeres? Cryobiology. 2012;65:72–73. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2012.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yong KW, Safwani WK, Xu F, Zhang X, Choi JR, Abas WA, et al. Assessment of tumourigenic potential in long-term cryopreserved human adipose-derived stem cells. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/term.2120. [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from Integrative Medicine Research are provided here courtesy of Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine

RESOURCES