Table 3.
Simulation analysis
| Proportion of telemonitored patients with EDP (%) | Probability of EDP patients to demonstrate this preference (%) | Assignment of EDP patients (%) | Assignment of NEDP patients (%) | Proportion of people in A1-A4 with NEDP (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A0 | A1-A4 | A0 | A1-A4 | |||
| 15% | 30% | 100.0 | 0.0 | 5.9 | 23.5 | 100.0 |
| 15% | 50% | 100.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 23.1 | 100.0 |
| 15% | 70% | 100.0 | 0.0 | 5.6 | 23.4 | 100.0 |
| 30% | 30% | 100.0 | 0.0 | 5.7 | 23.0 | 100.0 |
| 30% | 50% | 100.0 | 0.0 | 5.8 | 23.1 | 100.0 |
| 30% | 70% | 100.0 | 0.0 | 5.8 | 22.7 | 100.0 |
| 60% | 30% | 100.0 | 0.0 | 5.8 | 23.2 | 99.9 |
| 60% | 50% | 100.0 | 0.0 | 6.1 | 23.0 | 100.0 |
| 60% | 70% | 100.0 | 0.0 | 5.5 | 23.1 | 100.0 |
Note: Assumes patients submitted weight readings on 162 days. Based on 10,000 replications of the simulation experiment