Table 3. Comparison of postoperative study participant data (group 1=inverted ILM flap technique; group 2=ILM peeling).
| Characteristics | Group 1 | Group 2 | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Postoperative BCVA (logMAR; mean±SD) | |||
| 1 month | 0.95±0.30 | 1.05±0.38 | 0.68 |
| 3 months | 0.83±0.22 | 1.06±0.49 | 0.238 |
| 6 months | 0.62±0.35 | 1.02±0.41 | 0.045 |
| Improvement in BCVA | –0.41±0.29 | 0.02±0.36 | 0.021 |
| Primary MH closure rate | 100% (6/6) | 55.5% (5/9) | 0.056 |
| Final MH closure rate | 100% (6/6) | 88.8% (8/9) | 0.398 |
| Primary retinal reattachment rate | 100% (6/6) | 55.5% (5/9) | 0.056 |
| Final reattachment rate | 100% (6/6) | 88.8% (8/9) | 0.398 |
Abbreviations: BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; ILM, internal limiting membrane; logMAR, logarithm of minimum angle of resolution MH, macular hole.