Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 9;116(8):1037–1045. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.45

Table 3. Results of meta-analysis for AUC and sensitivity/specificity.

Comparison Marker Clinical question Studies, n AUC (95% CI) Tau2 Q I2
(CR+PR) vs (SD+PD) CEA Treatment monitoring 5 0.728 (0.599–0.871) 1.683 35.774 88.384
  CYFRA 21-1   5 0.724 (0.667–0.785) 0.070 4.805 22.738
Comparison Marker Clinical question Studies, n Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) Tau2 sensitivity Tau2 specificity
(CR+PR) vs (SD+PD) CEA Prediction 5 0.568 (0.495–0.638) 0.536 (0.417–0.652) 0.053 0.233
    Treatment monitoring 8 0.747 (0.642–0.830) 0.698 (0.594–0.785) 0.349 0.345
  CYFRA 21-1 Prediction 4 0.505 (0.377–0.633) 0.672 (0.582–0.751) 0.210 0.076
    Treatment monitoring 7 0.791 (0.715–0.851) 0.606 (0.538–0.671) 0.139 0.059
(PD) vs (CR+PR+SD) CEA Prediction 2 0.625 (0.501–0.734) 0.522 (0.430–0.614) 0.000 0.000
    Treatment monitoring 2 0.817 (0.661–0.911) 0.317 (0.066–0.755) 0.113 1.812
  CYFRA 21-1 Prediction 3 0.593 (0.289–0.839) 0.660 (0.292–0.902) 1.166 1.806
    Treatment monitoring 2 0.844 (0.638–0.943) 0.714 (0.383–0.909) 0.244 0.859

Abbreviations: AUC=area under the curve; CEA=carcinoembryonic antigen; CI=confidence interval; CR=complete response; CYFRA 21-1=cytokeratin-19 fragments; PD=progressive disease; PR=partial response; SD=stable disease.