Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 20;4(4):1600504. doi: 10.1002/advs.201600504

Table 1.

PV parameters of best performing PSC devices fabricated based on TiO2 NF photoelectrodes with different SWCNT loadings (extracted from the J–V characteristics reported in Figure 4). The average PCEs were calculated based on at least five devices. PV parameters of the best devices are highlighted in bold

Device J sc [mA cm−2] V oc [V] FF PCE [%]
TiO2 NF‐only 15.91; 0.87; 0.62; 8.56;
15.44 ± 0.54 0.87 ± 0.01 0.61 ± 0.01 8.21 ± 0.46
0.02 wt% SWCNTs 17.20; 0.93; 0.62; 9.91;
17.11 ± 0.20 0.92 ± 0.01 0.61 ± 0.01 9.69 ± 0.23
0.05 wt% SWCNTs 19.34; 0.93; 0.61; 11.05;
19.04 ± 0.43 0.93 ± 0.00 0.61 ± 0.00 10.81 ± 0.34
0.10 wt% SWCNTs 20.68; 0.94; 0.62; 12.03;
20.26 ± 0.37 0.94 ± 0.01 0.62 ± 0.01 11.51 ± 0.40
0.20 wt% SWCNTs 19.24; 0.92; 0.60; 10.54;
19.16 ± 0.31 0.91 ± 0.01 0.59 ± 0.01 10.16 ± 0.32
0.40 wt% SWCNTs 17.56; 0.90; 0.62; 9.80;
17.43 ± 0.37 0.89 ± 0.01 0.60 ± 0.02 9.40 ± 0.39