Table 2.
Eighth Grade Multivariable Logistic Regression Models Predicting Tobacco Use, 2000–2006
| Variable | Current cigarette use (Weighted N = 55,520) aOR (95% CI) |
Daily cigarette use (Weighted N = 55,520) aOR (95% CI) |
Current smokeless tobacco use (Weighted N = 25,968) aOR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individual-level characteristics | |||
| Sex | |||
| Male | 0.90 (0.83, 0.98) | 0.99(0.88, 1.11) | 4.30 (3.30, 5.60) |
| Female | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Age | |||
| ≤ 13 years | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| ≥14 years | 1.59(1.45, 1.74) | 1.88(1.68,2.10) | 1.33(1.08, 1.64) |
| Race | |||
| Non-Hispanic White | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 0.43 (0.35, 0.54) | 0.25(0.18,0.34) | 0.57(0.32, 1.01) |
| Hispanic | 1.16(1.04, 1.29) | 0.97(0.78, 1.21) | 1.27(0.94, 1.71) |
| Other | 0.95 (0.84, 1.08) | 0.85(0.66, 1.10) | 0.81(0.60,1.11) |
| Familial-level characteristics | |||
| Parent’s education | |||
| Both parents ≤ high school | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| At least one parent >high school | 0.67(0.61,0.72) | 0.59(0.51,0.68) | 0.72(0.61,0.86) |
| Number of parents in the home | |||
| None | 2.74(2.35,3.18) | 3.14(2.50,3.94) | 1.79(1.10,2.93) |
| One | 1.76(1.62, 1.93) | 1.93(1.73,2.15) | 1.01 (0.79, 1.28) |
| 2 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| School-level characteristics | |||
| Type of school | |||
| Public | 1.20(0.94, 1.53) | 1.52(1.004,2.30) | 0.97(0.47,2.01) |
| Private | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| School size | |||
| Small (1-99 students in targeted grade) | 0.78(0.61,0.98) | 0.67(0.51,0.88) | 0.91 (0.64, 1.31) |
| Medium (100–199 students in targeted grade) | 0.84(0.76,0.93) | 0.81(0.71,0.93) | 0.76(0.58,0.98) |
| Large (≥200 students in targeted grade) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| % of students on subsidized lunch | 1.013(1.010, 1.015) | 1.016(1.010, 1.021) | 1.011(1.004, 1.018) |
| % of students Black | 0.993 (0.989, 0.996) | 0.994 (0.988, 0.999) | 0.990(0.981,0.999) |
| % of students Hispanic | 0.988 (0.983, 0.993) | 0.981(0.971,0.991) | 0.981 (0.969, 0.993) |
|
Population density: Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) |
|||
| Non SMSA | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Other SMSA | 0.96(0.76, 1.21) | 0.96(0.75, 1.23) | 0.65(0.38, 1.10) |
| Large SMSA (self-representing) | 0.90(0.70, 1.15) | 0.87(0.64, 1.19) | 0.50(0.30,0.81) |
| State tobacco policies | |||
| Cigarette excise tax ($) | 0.89(0.76, 1.05) | 0.83 (0.66, 1.04) | 0.69(0.51,0.94) |
| Smoke-free air score | 0.99(0.94, 1.04) | 0.97(0.91, 1.03) | 1.03(0.93, 1.14) |
| PUP score | 1.01 (0.94, 1.09) | 0.99(0.89, 1.10) | 1.08(0.92, 1.27) |
| Youth access to tobacco score | 1.00(0.99, 1.01) | 1.00(0.98, 1.01) | 1.02(1.002, 1.03) |
| Synar retailer violation rate (%) | 1.00(0.99, 1.01) | 1.00(0.99, 1.01) | 0.99(0.97, 1.01) |
| School tobacco policy | |||
| Tobacco Policy Monitoring Score | 1.00(0.92, 1.09) | 0.99(0.90, 1.09) | 1.05 (0.86, 1.29) |
| Exposure to anti-smoking advertising | |||
| 0 TRP | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| < 1 TRP | 0.85 (0.75, 0.96) | 0.91 (0.78, 1.06) | 0.69(0.52,0.91) |
| ≥ 1 TRP | 0.76 (0.58, 0.98) | 0.82(0.60, 1.12) | 0.55 (0.34, 0.89) |
| State tobacco acres (per 1000) | 1.000(0.999, 1.002) | 1.000(0.997, 1.002) | 1.000(0.995, 1.004) |
| Survey year | 0.91(0.87,0.94) | 0.92 (0.88, 0.96) | 0.99 (0.92, 1.07) |
| Model c-statistic | 0.679 | 0.722 | 0.752 |