Table 3.
Tenth Grade Multivariable Logistic Regression Models Predicting Tobacco Use, 2000–2006
| Variable | Current cigarette use (Weighted N = 51,614) aOR (95% CI) |
Daily cigarette use (Weighted N = 51,614) aOR (95% CI) |
Current smokeless tobacco use (Weighted N = 24,849) aOR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individual-level characteristics | |||
| Sex | |||
| Male | 0.90(0.81,0.99) | 0.87(0.79,0.96) | 8.05(6.41, 10.10) |
| Female | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Age | |||
| ≤15 years | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| ≥16 years | 1.23(1.16, 1.30) | 1.33(1.21, 1.46) | 1.26(1.07, 1.47) |
| Race | |||
| Non-Hispanic White | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 0.30 (0.24, 0.37) | 0.22(0.16,0.30) | 0.53(0.35,0.81) |
| Hispanic | 0.77 (0.64, 0.93) | 0.62 (0.47, 0.83) | 0.89(0.63, 1.27) |
| Other | 0.67(0.56,0.80) | 0.72 (0.59, 0.89) | 0.70 (0.52, 0.95) |
| Familial-level characteristics | |||
| Parent’s education | |||
| Both parents ≤ high school | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| At least one parent >high school | 0.67(0.63,0.72) | 0.56(0.52,0.61) | 0.81(0.72,0.92) |
| Number of parents in the home | |||
| None | 2.42(2.15,2.73) | 3.04(2.63,3.52) | 2.32(1.68,3.20) |
| One | 1.56(1.46, 1.66) | 1.83(1.72, 1.96) | 1.28(1.08, 1.51) |
| 2 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| School-level characteristics | |||
| Type of school | |||
| Public | 1.15(0.88, 1.50) | 1.60(1.11,2.29) | 0.94(0.65, 1.36) |
| Private | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| School size | |||
| Small (1–99 students in targeted grade) | 1.11(0.92, 1.34) | 1.19(0.94, 1.49) | 0.98(0.69, 1.41) |
| Medium (100–199 students in targeted grade) | 1.04(0.96, 1.13) | 1.10(0.97, 1.25) | 1.01 (0.74, 1.37) |
| Large (≥200 students in targeted grade) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| % of students on subsidized lunch | 1.002(0.999, 1.006) | 1.003 (0.999, 1.007) | 1.012(1.006, 1.017) |
| % of students Black | 0.999 (0.996, 1.002) | 1.000(0.996, 1.004) | 0.982 (0.975, 0.990) |
| % of students Hispanic | 0.988 (0.983, 0.993) | 0.981 (0.975, 0.988) | 0.970 (0.962, 0.978) |
|
Population density: Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) |
|||
| Non SMSA | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Other SMSA | 0.78 (0.66, 0.93) | 0.81(0.68,0.96) | 0.60 (0.44, 0.80) |
| Large SMSA (self-representing) | 0.77(0.63,0.93) | 0.79 (0.65, 0.95) | 0.75 (0.53, 1.04) |
| State tobacco policies | |||
| Cigarette excise tax ($) | 0.97(0.88, 1.07) | 0.96(0.87, 1.06) | 0.92(0.74, 1.14) |
| Smoke-free air score | 0.99(0.95, 1.03) | 0.98(0.93, 1.03) | 0.96(0.89, 1.04) |
| PUP score | 0.97(0.91, 1.03) | 0.97(0.90, 1.06) | 1.09(0.98, 1.22) |
| Youth access to tobacco score | 1.00(0.99, 1.01) | 1.00(0.99, 1.02) | 1.00(0.99, 1.02) |
| Synar retailer violation rate (%) | 1.01 (0.998, 1.01) | 1.01 (0.999, 1.02) | 1.00(0.98, 1.02) |
| School tobacco policy | |||
| Tobacco Policy Monitoring Score | 1.03(0.96, 1.11) | 1.01 (0.94, 1.08) | 0.99(0.85, 1.15) |
| Exposure to anti-smokine advertising | |||
| 0 TRP | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| < 1 TRP | 1.04(0.91, 1.18) | 1.05(0.91, 1.20) | 0.88(0.72, 1.09) |
| ≥ 1 TRP | 0.98(0.83, 1.15) | 0.94(0.76, 1.17) | 0.82(0.57, 1.17) |
| State tobacco acres (per 1000) | 1.001 (1.000, 1.002) | 1.001 (1.000, 1.002) | 1.003(1.001, 1.005) |
| Survey year | 0.93 (0.90, 0.96) | 0.91(0.89,0.94) | 1.01 (0.93, 1.09) |
| Model C-statistic | 0.645 | 0.687 | 0.791 |