Table 4.
Twelfth Grade Multivariable Logistic Regression Models Predicting Tobacco Use, 2000–2006
| Variable | Current cigarette use (Weighted N = 46,514) aOR (95% CI) |
Daily cigarette use (Weighted N = 46,514) aOR (95% CI) |
Current smokeless tobacco use (Weighted N = 7721) aOR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individual-level characteristics | |||
| Sex | |||
| Male | 1.09(1.02, 1.17) | 1.07(0.99, 1.16) | 14.18(8.79,22.88) |
| Female | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Age | |||
| ≤17 years | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| ≥ 18 years | 1.09(1.03, 1.15) | 1.07(0.99, 1.14) | 1.48(1.14, 1.92) |
| Race | |||
| Non-Hispanic White | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 0.29 (0.23, 0.36) | 0.21(0.16,0.28) | 0.13(0.05,0.36) |
| Hispanic | 0.84(0.75,0.93) | 0.74 (0.64, 0.86) | 0.78(0.36, 1.70) |
| Other | 0.77 (0.66, 0.90) | 0.77 (0.66, 0.89) | 0.54(0.32,0.93) |
| Familial-level characteristics | |||
| Parent’s education | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Both parents ≤ high school | 0.88(0.82,0.94) | 0.78 (0.72, 0.84) | 0.79 (0.63, 0.996) |
| At least one parent >high school | |||
| Number of parents in the home | |||
| None | 1.80(1.54,2.11) | 2.26(1.92,2.65) | 1.20 (0.65, 2.20) |
| One | 1.38(1.29, 1.47) | 1.53(1.43, 1.63) | 0.80(0.59, 1.09) |
| 2 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| School-level characteristics | |||
| Type of school | |||
| Public | 0.97(0.81, 1.16) | 1.07(0.88, 1.31) | 0.78(0.49, 1.23) |
| Private | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| School size | |||
| Small (1–99 students in targeted grade) | 1.14(0.96, 1.34) | 1.27(1.06, 1.52) | 1.29 (0.83, 2.00) |
| Medium (100–199 students in targeted grade) | 1.01(0.91, 1.12) | 1.06(0.94, 1.20) | 1.37(1.06, 1.77) |
| Large (≥200 students in targeted grade) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| % of students on subsidized lunch, median (IQR) | 0.999 (0.995, 1.002) | 1.002 (0.997, 1.006) | 1.001 (0.994, 1.009) |
| % of students Black, median (IQR) | 0.997(0.992, 1.001) | 0.998 (0.994, 1.002) | 0.988 (0.975, 1.000) |
| % of students Hispanic, median (IQR) | 0.994 (0.990, 0.998) | 0.988 (0.982, 0.993) | 0.987(0.975,0.995) |
|
Population density: Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) |
|||
| Non SMSA | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Other SMSA | 0.97(0.84, 1.13) | 0.99(0.83, 1.18) | 0.92(0.58, 1.46) |
| Large SMSA (self-representing) | 1.00(0.85, 1.18) | 1.04(0.87, 1.25) | 0.63 (0.37, 1.06) |
| State tobacco policies | |||
| Cigarette excise tax ($) | 0.84(0.73,0.97) | 0.86(0.73, 1.01) | 0.67(0.51,0.87) |
| Smoke-free air score | 0.98(0.95, 1.02) | 0.99(0.95, 1.03) | 0.90(0.82, 1.00) |
| PUP score | 1.00(0.94, 1.07) | 0.99(0.92, 1.08) | 0.95 (0.83, 1.09) |
| Youth access to tobacco score | 1.00(0.996, 1.01) | 1.00(0.99, 1.01) | 1.03(1.01, 1.05) |
| Synar retailer violation rate (%) | 1.01 (1.00, 1.02) | 1.01 (0.998, 1.02) | 1.01 (0.99, 1.02) |
| School tobacco policy | |||
| Tobacco Policy Monitoring Score | 1.01(0.93, 1.10) | 1.02(0.93, 1.12) | 1.04(0.88, 1.22) |
| Exposure to anti-smoking advertising | |||
| 0 TRP | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| < 1 TRP | 0.98(0.87, 1.10) | 0.95 (0.83, 1.08) | 0.80(0.61, 1.05) |
| ≥ 1 TRP | 0.95 (0.82, 1.09) | 0.94(0.81, 1.08) | 1.06(0.78, 1.46) |
| State tobacco acres (per 1000) | 1.000 (0.999, 1.002) | 1.001 (1.000, 1.002) | 1.002 (0.999, 1.005) |
| Survey year | 0.95 (0.92, 0.98) | 0.93 (0.90, 0.96) | 1.05(0.97, 1.13) |
| Model C-statistic | 0.627 | 0.656 | 0.825 |