Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Feb 6;65(4):e89–e94. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14728

Table 2.

Outcomes by Handfeeding Technique and Meal Type

Outcome: Handfeeding
Technique
Direct Hand
(DH)
Mean (SD)
Over Hand
(OH)
Mean (SD)
Under Hand
(UH)
Mean (SD)
P value Multiple Comparisons

Time spent providing
assistance (min)
42.4 (9.2) 45.2 (9.2) 44.1 (9.3) 0.1654
Percent meal intake
(tray weights)

67.0 (15.2)

59.9 (15.1)

65.0 (15.0)

0.0239

DH vs OH; p < .0001
DH vs UH; p = 0.1937
OH vs UH; p = .0016
Percent meal intake
(by rater estimation)
78.0 (15.5) 75.0 (15.4) 75.8 (15.3) 0.5546
EdFED total score
(feeding behaviors)

8.0 (1.8)

8.3 (1.8)

7.7 (1.8)

0.0255

DH vs OH: p = .0412
DH vs UH; p = 0.2390
OH vs UH; p = .0014

Outcome: Meal Type Breakfast (B)
Mean (SD)
Lunch (L)
Mean (SD)
Dinner (D)
Mean (SD)
P value Multiple Comparisons

Time spent providing
assistance (min)

41.5 (9.1)

45.8 (9.1)

44.4 (9.2)

0.0147

B vs L; p < .0001
B vs D; p = 0.0026
L vs D: p = 0.1594
Percent meal intake
(tray weights)
61.9% (15.2) 67.1% (15.2) 62.9% (15.3) 0.1261
Percent meal intake
(by rater estimation)
75.2% (15.4) 78.5% (15.3) 75.0% (15.4) 0.3465
EdFED total score
(feeding behaviors)
7.7 (1.8) 8.0 (1.8) 8.2 (1.8) 0.0873

Note: P value for Random coefficients regression model for repeated measurements (RRM); Multiple comparison = A posteriori least squares t-tests calculated by the RRM. EdFED scores could range from 0–20, with higher scores indicative of more feeding behaviors observed and greater feeding assistance needed by resident with dementia.