Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 16;20(3):475–480. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0630-4

Table 1.

Comparison of tissue quantity between DNAB and FNA

Specimen (no.) Tumor diameter (mm) Diagnostic method Preoperative diagnosis Pathological diagnosis by resected specimen Macroscopic tissue quantity Microscopic tissue quantity
In DNAB In FNA
1 20 × 15 EUS-FNA GIST GIST DNAB > FNA
2 20 × 17 × 16 EUS-FNA GIST GIST DNAB > FNA ×
3 22 × 18 × 18 EUS-FNA GIST GIST DNAB > FNA
4 22 × 20 × 20 EUS-FNA GIST GIST DNAB > FNA
5 22 × 20 × 9 EUS-FNA No tissue Aberrant pancreas DNAB > FNA
6 25 × 18 × 15 EUS-FNA GIST GIST DNAB > FNA
7 25 × 24 × 16 EUS-FNA No tissue Schwannoma DNAB > FNA ×
8 27 × 17 × 10 EUS-FNA GIST GIST DNAB > FNA
9 30 × 25 × 20 Bx GIST GIST DNAB > FNA
10 35 × 35 × 25 Non-enforcement Hematoid SMT GIST DNAB > FNA
11 50 × 40 × 30 EUS-FNA GIST GIST DNAB > FNA
12 60 × 40 × 37 Bx GIST GIST DNAB > FNA
13 80 × 60 Bx Chronic gastritis GIST DNAB > FNA

EUS-FNA endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy

Bx biopsy

GIST gastrointestinal stromal tumor

SMT submucosal tumor

FNA fine-needle aspiration biopsy on the desk

DNAB drill needle aspiration biopsy on the desk

> The left is larger than the right

◎ A sufficient quantity to make a tissue diagnosis

○ An appropriate quantity to make a tissue diagnosis

△ A moderately insufficient quantity to make a tissue diagnosis

× No tissue