Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 20;8:577. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00577

Table 3.

Fourteen phenotypic traits and their assessment criteria used for trait association in three mapping populations (TA × KP, Cr × KP, and I × KP).

Trait Rating Score description
Stage of ripeness 0 Hard (no give in fruit)
1 Rubbery (slight give in fruit under strong thumb pressure)
2 Sprung (flesh deforms by 2–3 mm with moderate thumb pressure)
3 Firm soft (whole fruit deforms with moderate hand pressure)
4 Eating soft (whole fruit deforms with soft hand pressure)
Fruit shape 1 Long
2 Ovate
3 Round
Ground skin color 1 Green
2 Green/yellow
3 Yellow
4 Orange
5 Pink
Blush color 1 Orange
2 Pink
3 Red
4 Burgundy
Blush intensity 1 No blush
2 Blush barely visible
3 Slight blush (similar to Kensington Pride)
4 Medium blush (similar to Haden)
5 Solid blush (similar to Tommy Atkins)
Bloom (the efflorescence of the wax covering the fruit) 1 Heavy
2 Light
Stem end shape 1 Deep
2 Slightly depressed
3 Level
4 Slightly raised
5 Pointed
Pulp colora 1 Orange group 24A
2 Yellow orange group 32A
3 Yellow group 15A
4 Yellow group 13B
5 Yellow group 6A
Embryo type 1 Monoembryonic
2 Polyembryonic
Flavor 1 Unacceptable
2 Floridian
3 Indian
4 Other
5 Kensington Pride
6 South East Asian
Branch habit 1 Upright
2 Spreading
3 Intermediate
Tree vigor 1 Extreme dwarf
2 Dwarf
3 Low vigor
4 Medium vigor
5 High vigor
Beak shape (prominence of the point at the stylar scar) 1 Absent
2 Very slight
3 Slight
4 Medium
5 Prominent
Cleavage (severity of the groove on the ventral shoulder of the fruit) 1 Deep
2 Shallow
3 Absent
a

The_Royal_Horticultural_Society, 2001.