Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 20;27(2):179–188. doi: 10.18865/ed.27.2.179

Table 3. Four-factor solution of the CRAI-19 after principal components analysisa, n=131.

CRAI-19 Factorsb
Factor 1c Factor 2c Factor 3c Factor 4c
1. Choose an appropriate research design that will answer a set of research questions and/or test a set of hypotheses .774b .329 .268 .149
2. State the purpose, strengths and limitations of each study design .760 b .307 .317 .203
3. Determine an adequate number of subjects for your research project .809 b .346 .109 .083
4. Design the best data analysis strategy for your study .880 b .217 .201 .089
5. Evaluate the reliability and validity of a given measurement .714 b .313 .350 .259
6. Ensure data collection is reliable across trials, raters, or equipment .707 b .174 .311 .356
7. Avoid the violation of statistical assumptions .816 b .142 .352 .051
8. Prepare a research proposal suitable for submission in one’s research area .373 .707 b .290 .189
9. Locate appropriate forms for a grant application .300 .667 b .206 .328
10. Prepare a project budget for a grant application .241 .654 b .142 .430
11. Identify faculty collaborators from within and outside the discipline who can offer guidance to the project .239 .776 b .255 .118
12. Sustain effective collaborations .207 .789 b .318 .157
13. Terminate a collaboration that isn’t working .206 .765 b .164 .032
14. Write a literature review that critically synthesizes the literature relevant to your own research question .251 .392 .746 b .229
15. Write a methods section that conveys sufficient methodological detail to permit subsequent replication of your work by others .411 .284 .758 b .229
16. Write the results section of a research paper that clearly summarizes and describes the results, free of interpretative comments .391 .225 .836 b .132
17. Write a discussion section for a research paper that articulates the importance of your findings relative to other studies in the field .338 .353 .805 b .117
18. Apply the appropriate process for obtaining informed consent from research subjects .175 .228 .164 .913 b
19. Write a human subjects consent form containing the appropriate elements .179 .206 .187 .910 b

CRAI, Clinical Research Appraisal Inventory.

a. Cronbach’s alphas: CRAI-19, .960; Factor 1, writing, .955; Factor 2, Study design/data analysis, .907; Factor 3, Collaboration/grants, .948; Factor 4, Consent process, .953.

b. Denotes items included in computation of each subscale’s scores.

c. Percentage of variance explained: Factor 1=27.7%; Factor 2=22.1%; Factor 3=18.1%; Factor 4=12.9%; overall CRAI-19=80.9%.