Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 20;27(2):189–200. doi: 10.18865/ed.27.2.189

Table 1. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in selected developed countries.

Reference Criteria used Study design N Age,a years Country MetS prevalence
Male % Female %
Aguilar et al10 Modified NCEP NHANES, 2003-12; Cross-sectional 1,931 ≥20 United States (MetS prevalence per ethnic group: African American, 33.0%; Hispanic, 35.0%; Non-Hispanic Whites, 33.0%) 30.3 35.6
Khan and Jackson11 Harmonized Cross-sectional (urban) 1,403 20-68 United States (South Asian Americans) 47.0 54.0
Tillin et al12 Modified NCEP Cross-sectional (urban) 4,860 40-69 United Kingdom
African Caribbeans 15.5b 23.4 b
Europeans 18.4 b 14.4b
South Asians 28.8 b 31.8 b
Villegas et al13 Modified NCEP Cross-sectional (urban) 890 50-69 Ireland 21.8 21.5
Jeppesen et al14 Modified NCEP Cross-sectional (urban) 2,493 41-72 Denmark 18.6 14.3
Cameron et al15 IDF Cross-sectional (population- based) 6,072 50.5 ± 11.7 Australia 39.2 27.9
Bo et al16 Modified NCEP Cross-sectional (urban) 1,877 45-64 Italy 24.1 23.1

a. Age range or mean age of participants as provided by the respective journal articles.

b. Age-adjusted MetS prevalence used.

NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; NCEP, National Cholesterol Education Program; IDF, International Diabetes Federation.