Table 7.
Numbers of individuals in religiosity-alcohol use profile combinations.
| Alcohol use profile | Religiosity profile |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loyal | Reserved | Apathetic | Total | |||||
| Problem | 8 | 2.5% | 161 | 50.9% | 147 | 46.5% | 316 | 100.0% |
| 1.4% | 13.5% | 17.5% | ||||||
| Nonproblem | 227 | 32.1% | 305 | 43.1% | 176 | 24.9% | 708 | 100.0% |
| 39.1% | 25.6% | 21.0% | ||||||
| Low-intake | 110 | 12.5% | 439 | 49.7% | 334 | 37.8% | 883 | 100.0% |
| 19.0% | 36.9% | 39.8% | ||||||
| Abstainers | 235 | 33.4% | 286 | 40.7% | 182 | 25.9% | 703 | 100.0% |
| 40.5% | 24.0% | 21.7% | ||||||
| Total | 580 | 1191 | 839 | 2610 | ||||
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | ||||||
Religiosity profiles were derived from wave 2 responses (Mage = 16.5), whereas alcohol use profiles were derived from wave 4 responses (Mage = 28.5). Percentages to the right of the cell reflect proportion of the religiosity profile in the respective alcohol use profile; percentages below the cell reflect the proportion of the alcohol use profile in that particular religiosity profile. Percentages may be off by 0.1% due to rounding. These ns were taken from the full model; they will not match with the unconditional latent profile analysis models in Figures 2 and 3.