Table 3. Significant two-way comparisons of bab genotype and other factors in both populations^a.

bab genotype comparison	P valueb for distribution within
	KH	AH	Combinedc
babA,B,C or empty at Locus A vs babA,B,C or empty at Locus B	0.1046	0.0028	0.0131
babA,B,C or empty at Locus A vs Full or empty bab at Locus C	0.0027	0.4111	0.4500
babA,B,C or empty at Locus A vs one or two hom loci occupied	0.0167	<0.0001	0.0029
babB ‘IN’ or Other at Locus B vs one or two hom loci occupied	0.0210	1.0000	0.6070
Full or empty bab at Locus C vs one or two hom loci occupied	1.0000	0.0390	0.1750
babA,B,C or empty at Locus A vs homA or homB	0.6390	<0.0001	<0.0001
babA,B,C or empty at Locus B vs homA or homB	0.7340	0.0160	0.0260
babA,B,C or empty at Locus A vs vacA s1 or vacA s2	1.0000	<0.0001	<0.0001
babA,B,C or empty at Locus A vs vacA i1 or vacA i2	0.9999	<0.0001	<0.0001
babA,B,C or empty at Locus A vs vacA m1 or vacA m2	0.9999	<0.0001	<0.0001
babA,B,C or empty at Locus A vs cagA EPIYA-ABD or Other	0.5010	N/A*	<0.0001
babA,B,C or empty at Locus B vs Cancer/Gastric ulcer or Duodenal ulcer/Gastritis	0.0101	0.974#	0.243#
babB or other at Locus B vs Cancer or Gastric ulcer or Duodenal ulcer or Gastritis	0.0012	0.225#	0.137#

^a For simplicity, Table 3 only contains associations for which a statistically significant association was found in at least one grouping; however, an exhaustive analysis was conducted on numerous other permutations of the data.

^b Statistically significant P values are in boldface type.

^c All isolates (n = 160) analyzed as a single group

*No ABD in the AH

^#Also includes a category for Esophagitis/Barrett's Esophagus

Red cells indicate corrected P-values.