Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 20;12(4):e0176468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176468

Table 4. Three-way comparisons of bab genotype and other factors in both populations.

bab genotype comparison P valuea for distribution within
KH AH Combinedb
babA, B or C at Locus A vs vacA i1/i2 vs one or two hom loci occupied N/A 0.097 0.001
babA, B or C at Locus A vs vacA s1/s2 vs one or two hom loci occupied N/A 0.173 0.002
babA, B or C at Locus A vs vacA m1/m2 vs one or two hom loci occupied N/A 0.882 0.001
babA, B or C at Locus A vs vacA s1i1m1/other vs one or two hom loci occupied 1.000 N/A# N/A#
babA, B or C at Locus A vs cagA (AB &Other$/ABCs/ABD) vs vacA m1/m2 N/A 0.972 0.075
babA, B or C at Locus A vs cagA (AB &Other$/ABCs/ABD) vs vacA s1/s2 N/A 0.781 0.666
babA, B or C at Locus A vs cagA (AB &Other$/ABCs/ABD) vs vacA i1/i2 N/A 0.571 0.075
babA, B or C at Locus A vs cagA (Other/ABD) vs vacA s1i1m1/other 1.000 N/A# N/A#
babA, B or C at Locus A vs cagA (AB &Other$/ABCs/ABD) vs one or two hom loci occupied 0.976 0.997 0.042
babA, B or C at Locus B vs one or two hom loci occupied vs vacA s1/s2 N/A* 0.823 0.061

a Statistically significant P values are in boldface type.

b All isolates (n = 160) analyzed as a single group.

#These comparisons were only done in KH; for AH and combined we looked at i, s, and m regions of vacA separately, which wasn’t feasible with KH since was overwhelmingly s1/i1/m1.

*All KH strains are vacA s1.

$AB&Other refers to any cagA EPIYA motif that is not ABC(1–4), or ABD.

Red cells indicate corrected P-values.