Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Mar 13;85(5):447–458. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000200

Table 5.

OLS Regression Path Estimates for Behavioral Mediators of 3-Month Heavy Drinking and Negative Consequences

a Path of BMI to Mediator b path of Mediator to Outcome
% Heavy Drinking Days Negative Consequences

β(se)~ p~ β(se) p β(se) p
Single Mediators
Rate Control 0.133 (.16) 0.404 −0.135 (.07) 0.045 −0.059 (.07) 0.436
Self-Reinforce/Punishment 0.141 (.16) 0.376 −0.234 (.07) <0.001 −0.122 (.08) 0.126
Alternatives 0.386 (.16) 0.017 −0.169 (.07) 0.012 −0.042 (.08) 0.588
Avoidance 0.331 (.16) 0.036 −0.180 (.07) 0.008 −0.190 (.08) 0.014
Limit Drive/Cash −0.151 (.16) 0.350 −0.043 (.07) 0.519 −0.085 (.08) 0.265
Time/Food Control −0.107 (.16) 0.512 0.001 (.07) 0.983 0.027 (.07) 0.719
Awareness 0.174 (.16) 0.276 −0.049 (.07) 0.467 −0.111 (.07) 0.132
Multiple Mediators*
Alternatives 0.386 (.16) 0.017 −0.117 (.07) 0.104
Avoidance 0.338 (.16) 0.034 −0.129 (.07) 0.077

Notes. Regression coefficient estimates significant at the .05 level in bold.

~

a path data shown for heavy drinking days; negative consequence a path estimates are substantively the same though vary slightly due to a different baseline covariate for the outcome variable (i.e., baseline negative consequences). Single mediator effect for the total scale score was non-significant.

*

Total indirect effect significant for bias corrected and percentile bootstrap confidence intervals (−.09; 95%CI: −.19 to −.02).