Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 29;15(5):581–593. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12655

Table 1.

Phenolic compounds which show significant differences between their abundance in LigDFG transgenic Arabidopsis plants and wild type

nr m/z RT (min) Identity WT amyDFG10 amyDFG12 ppiDFG1 Ratio of amyDFG10/WT
Compounds with increased abundance in amyDFG10
HPV‐like compounds
1 357.12 4.50 HPV + hexose 1569 8751 1502 2062 5.58
2 387.13 5.01 HPS + hexose 240 1944 187 196 8.10
3 399.16 6.45 HPV + hexose + acetate 2568 6277 2365 2000 2.44
Dilignols and dilignol hexosides 
4 373.13 11.85 Gox(β‐O‐4)G 1838 10 382 2079 2127 5.65
5 371.11 14.26 Gox(β‐O‐4)G′ 246 2020 132 405 8.21
6 581.19 8.42 Gox(β‐O‐4)G 4‐O‐hexoside (formic acid adduct) 28 2616 32 19 93.43
Neolignan‐like compounds
7 549.16 8.68 Gox(β‐O‐4)FA + hexose 1126 8516 562 982 7.56
8 549.16 9.19 Gox(β‐O‐4)FA + hexose 5 1634 4 4 326.80
9 549.15 9.73 Gox(β‐O‐4)FA + hexose 470 4759 313 375 10.13
10 503.12 12.21 Gox(β‐O‐4)FA + malate 1218 11 972 1039 1351 9.83
11 503.12 12.85 Gox(β‐O‐4)FA + malate 639 6681 559 636 10.46
12 665.17 9.06 Gox(β‐O‐4)FA + malate + hexose 6 1358 7 0 226.33
13 665.17 9.21 Gox(β‐O‐4)FA + malate + hexose 354 6307 185 384 17.82
14 773.23 14.02 Gox(β‐O‐4)FA + hexose + sinapic acid 1897 21 354 2273 2520 11.26
15 773.23 15.36 Gox(β‐O‐4)FA + hexose + sinapic acid 43 5128 123 79 119.26
16 935.29 11.14 Gox(β‐O‐4)FA + hexose + hexose + sinapic acid 94 5794 114 244 61.64
17 935.29 11.24 Gox(β‐O‐4)FA + hexose + hexose + SA 63 4159 11 173 66.02
18 935.29 11.71 Gox(β‐O‐4)FA + hexose + hexose + SA 17 1982 0 75 116.59
19 516.15 10.13 Gox(β‐O‐4)FA + glutamic acid 17 1459 40 18 85.82
20 417.12 12.29 Gox(β‐O‐4)SA + malate (‐malate) 419 1620 320 382 3.87
21 417.12 13.22 Gox(β‐O‐4)SA + malate (‐malate) 218 1367 193 181 6.27
Compounds with unknown identity 
22 225.04 3.47 Unknown 393 1010 333 417 2.57
23 385.12 12.17 Unknown 49 607 86 594 43 207 55 871 1.75
24 387.15 8.74 Unknown 2275 6362 2198 2226 2.80
Compounds with decreased abundance in amyDFG10
Compounds with unknown identity
25 419.14 8.57 Unknown 1583 394 1319 1264 0.25
26 389.13 8.88 Unknown 4931 1970 3762 3823 0.40

All significant differences in abundance were observed between the amyDFG10 line and wild type. The ratio represents the fold‐change in abundance between the listed transgenic line as compared to wild type. s.d., standard deviation; HPV, hydroxypropiovanillone; HPS, hydroxypropiosyringone; G, guaiacyl unit; Gox, α‐keto‐oxidized guaiacyl unit. The chemical structures of compounds 1–21 are shown in Figure 6.