Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 21;14:12. doi: 10.1186/s12014-017-9147-z

Table 5.

Statistical analysis of the SRM

Peptide T Mean ± SEM p value
1 ITLLSALVETR T1 Control: 22,938 ± 11,790; CAS: 418,327 ± 245,046 0.0032
T2 Control: 77,287 ± 41,645; CAS: 1,395,651 ± 811,858 0.0025
T3 Control: 42,469 ± 22,863; CAS: 792,453 ± 460,476 0.0032
2 LYGSEAFATDFQDSAAAK T1 Control: 32,992 ± 10,156; CAS: 77,827 ± 11,396 0.0055
T2 Control: 42,505 ± 14,734; CAS: 97,228 ± 14,444 0.0095
T3 Control: 31,132 ± 8909; CAS: 75,803 ± 10,252 0.0025
3 AVLDVFEEGTEASAATAVK T1 Control: 0.024 ± 0.001; CAS: 0.035 ± 0.006 0.0023
T2 Control: 0.022 ± 0.001; CAS: 0.030 ± 0.006 0.0325
T3 Control: 0.024 ± 0.001; CAS: 0.035 ± 0.006 0.0482

The peptide sequence is shown, along with the selected transitions (T) and the statistical significance (p value)