Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA. 2016 Oct 4;316(13):1366–1374. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14617

Table 2.

Efficacy and Quality of Life Outcomes of Intention-to-Treat Population at 6 Months

Outcomes OnabotulinumtoxinA (n = 190) Sacral Neuromodulation (n = 174) Treatment Group Difference (95% CI) P Value
Change in mean daily urgency urinary incontinence episodes, adjusted mean (95% CI)a   −3.89 (−4.26 to −3.52)   −3.25 (−3.64 to −2.87) 0.63 (0.13 to 1.14)   .01
Resolution of Urinary Incontinence, No./Total (%)b
≥4 mo of diaries completed
 Complete resolution   35/178 (20)     6/166 (4) −16 (−26 to −5) <.001
 ≥75% reduction   81/178 (46)   43/166 (26) −20 (−30 to −9) <.001
 ≥50% reduction 109/178 (61)   84/166 (51) −11 (−21 to 0)   .06
All 6 mo of diaries completedb
 Complete resolution   26/127 (20)     2/99 (2) −18 (−31 to −5) <.001
 ≥75% reduction   63/127 (50)   27/99 (27) −22 (−35 to −9)   .004
 ≥50% reduction   85/127 (67)   51/99 (52) −15 (−28 to −2)   .05
Change From Baseline in Urinary Incontinence, Adjusted Mean (95% CI)a
Any   −4.02 (−4.44 to −3.61)   −3.50 (−3.94 to −3.06) 0.52 (−0.04 to 1.09)   .07
Nocturia   −0.40 (−0.56 to −0.24)   −0.26 (−0.43 to −0.10) 0.13 (−0.08 to 0.35)   .22
Voids   −1.12 (−1.53 to −0.70)   −0.84 (−1.28 to −0.41) 0.28 (−0.29 to 0.84)   .34
Pads/d   −2.02 (−2.31 to −1.73)   −1.64 (−1.94 to −1.34) 0.38 (−0.01 to 0.77)   .06
Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Change From Baseline, Adjusted Mean (95% CI)
Questionnaire SF
 Symptom bother −46.7 (−50.5 to −43.0) −38.6 (−42.5 to −34.6) 8.1 (3.0 to 13.3)   .002
 Quality of life   41.6 (37.9 to 45.4)   38.1 (34.1 to 42.0) −3.6 (−8.7 to 1.5)   .17
Satisfaction Questionnairec
 Treatment satisfaction   67.7 (63.2 to 72.1)   59.8 (55.0 to 64.7) 7.8 (1.6 to 14.1)   .01
 Adverse effects   88.4 (84.7 to 92.2)   85.1 (81.1 to 89.2) 3.3 (−1.9 to 8.5)   .22
 Endorsement   78.1 (73.7 to 82.4)   67.6 (62.9 to 72.3) 10.4 (4.3 to 16.5) <.001
 Convenience   67.6 (63.7 to 71.6)   70.2 (65.8 to 74.5) −2.5 (−8.1 to 3.0)   .36
 Treatment preference, No. (%)d 113 (92)   89 (89) −3 (−16 to 10)   .49
Score at 6 Months, No. (%)
PGI-Ie
 Urinary leakage 101 (71)   91 (68) −2 (−14 to 10)   .82
 Bladder function 100 (68)   92 (70) 2 (−10 to 13)   .54
Sandvikf   .14
 Slight   29 (23)   23 (19)
 Moderate   33 (26)   33 (27)
 Severe   28 (22)   24 (19)
 Very severe   36 (29)   44 (35)
Change From Baseline, Adjusted Mean (95% CI)
Urinary Distress Inventory SFg −10.0 (−12.2 to −7.8)   −8.6 (−10.9 to −6.3) −1.4 (−4.4 to 1.6)   .36
Incontinence Impact SFh −12.4 (−14.9 to −9.9) −10.4 (−13.0 to −7.8) −2.0 (−5.4 to 1.4)   .25
Health Utility Index 3i   −0.011 (−0.028 to 0.007)   −0.006 (−0.025 to 0.013) −0.005 (−0.029 to 0.020)   .72

Abbreviations: PGI-I, Patient Global Impression of Improvement; SF, Short Form.

a

Values for any urinary incontinence, urgency urinary incontinence, nocturia, voids are based on mean number of episodes per day on a 3-day diary captured monthly and are generated from model-based estimates. The adjusted models controlled for the stratification variables of age and clinical site.

b

Represents individuals who had this degree of improvement on all their diaries.

c

Values for the Overactive Bladder Satisfaction questionnaire range from 0–100 and includes 5 subscales; treatment satisfaction, side effects, treatment endorsement, convenience, and patient preference, with higher scores reflecting better satisfaction.

d

Treatment preference is a binary outcome that is classified as yes if a participant answers either “Slight preference for the treatment I am receiving now” or “Definitely prefer the treatment I am receiving now” to the question: “Do you prefer the treatment that you received since entering this study to the treatment you received before the study?” from the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire SF.

e

The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a patient reported measure of perceived improvement with treatment on a scale of 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Included here are participants who had adequate improvement, defined as a rating of 1, 2 or 3 (better).

f

The Sandvik scale has a range of 1–12, with higher scores representing worse outcomes.

g

The Urinary Distress Inventory short form (UDI-SF) scale has a range of 0–100, with higher scores indicating greater distress.

h

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form (IIQ-SF) scale has a range of 0–100, with higher scores representing a worse quality of life.

i

The Health Utility Index, Version 3 (HUI 3) scale has a range of 0–1, with higher scores representing better health.