Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2017 Mar 1;113:193–199. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.042

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Percent weight change over time by treatment and delay discounting, The time × condition × delay discounting interaction was marginally significant (p < .10). Delay discounting was dichotomized above for graphical purposes. Better delay discounting (i.e., less discounting) is defined as those who scored in the upper quartile, and worse as those who scored in the lower quartile.