Table 3.
Stepwise Logistic Regression Models Predicting Diagnostic Stability of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
Domain-Level Regression Models | Odds Ratio | (95% Confidence Interval) | P | Hosmer-Lemeshow P* | Area Under the Curve† |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Demographic factors | 0.81 | 0.67 | |||
| |||||
ApoE4 alleles | < 0.001 | ||||
0 versus 2 | 4.03 | (2.38, 6.82) | |||
0 versus 1 | 1.84 | (1.37, 2.39) | |||
Age (years) | 0.96 | (0.94, 0.98) | < 0.001 | ||
Nonamnestic MCI subtype | 1.84 | (1.21, 2.80) | 0.003 | ||
No depression | 1.63 | (1.19, 2.24) | 0.005 | ||
Education (years) | 0.96 | (0.91, 1.00) | 0.012 | ||
| |||||
Global function | 0.40 | 0.76 | |||
| |||||
Clinical Dementia Rating Scale−Sum of Boxes | 0.57 | (0.49, 0.67) | < 0.001 | ||
Mini-Mental State Examination | 1.32 | (1.22, 1.42) | < 0.001 | ||
Functional Activities Questionnaire | 0.95 | (0.91, 0.98) | < 0.01 | ||
| |||||
Neuropsychological performance | 0.18 | 0.75 | |||
| |||||
Logical Memory Delayed Recall | 1.20 | (1.15, 1.24) | < 0.001 | ||
Vegetable fluency | 1.11 | (1.06, 1.16) | < 0.001 | ||
Digit Symbol | 1.04 | (1.02, 1.05) | < 0.001 | ||
| |||||
Overall regression model | 0.32 | 0.80 | |||
| |||||
Logical Memory Delayed Recall | 1.69 | (1.43, 1.99) | < 0.001 | ||
Clinical Dementia Rating Scale−Sum of Boxes | 0.54 | (0.46, 0.64) | < 0.001 | ||
Mini-Mental State Examination | 1.16 | (1.05, 1.28) | < 0.001 | ||
Age (years) | 0.95 | (0.93, 0.98) | < 0.01 | ||
ApoE4 alleles | < 0.01 | ||||
0 versus 2 | 2.83 | (1.52, 5.26) | |||
0 versus 1 | 1.82 | (1.48, 3.37) | |||
Digit Symbol | 1.30 | (1.09, 1.56) | < 0.01 |
For details on the neuropsychological tests, see Weintraub et al, 2009.
Values > 0.05 indicate sufficient model fit (Tabachnik and Fidell, 1996).
Values of 0.50 and 1.00 indicate poor and perfect prediction, respectively (Tabachnik and Fidell, 1996).
ApoE4 = apolipoprotein E4.