Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 1;7(3):152–171. doi: 10.1089/brain.2016.0475

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Summary of the FPR results examined in Eklund and associates (2016), combining all their test results (available from their GitHub repository). The results of each software across all voxelwise p = 0.01 and p = 0.001 cases are shown separately. Red lines show the median; the box covers the 25–75% interquartile range; whiskers extend to the most extreme data point within 1.5 × the interquartile range; and outliers are shown as dots. For a given voxelwise p, results are similar across parametric methods, with typical ranges of 15–30% FPR for p = 0.01 and 5–15% FPR for p = 0.001.