Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 9;5(3):2325967117693223. doi: 10.1177/2325967117693223

TABLE 5.

Comprehensiveness Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measuresa

Instrument Pain/Discomfort (max = 5) Function (max = 5) QoL/Satisfaction (max = 1) Score (max = 11) Questions, n Efficiency Score
ASES 2 5 0 7 18 0.39
Constant 2 4 0 6 10 0.6
UCLA 3 4 1 8 5 1.6
SST 2 4 0 6 12 0.5
SF-12 1 4 1 6 12 0.5
SF-36 2 4 1 7 36 0.19
WORC 2 5 1 8 21 0.38
DASH 2 5 1 8 30 0.27
QuickDASH 2 5 0 7 11 0.64
JOA 1 4 1 6 36 0.17
Penn 4 5 1 10 25 0.4
RC-QoL 5 5 1 11 34 0.32
SPADI 4 3 0 7 13 0.54
SRQ 2 5 1 8 21 0.38
KSS 3 4 1 8 17 0.47
Marx 0 3 0 3 7 0.43
Mean 2.31 4.31 0.63 7.25 19.25 0.49

aASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder outcome score; Contant, Constant Murley score; DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score; KSS, Korean Shoulder Scoring System; Marx, Marx Shoulder Activity Scale; Penn, Penn shoulder score; QoL, quality of life; QuickDASH, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score; RC-QoL, Quality of Life Outcome Measure for Rotator Cuff Disease; SF-12, Short Form–12; SF-36, Short Form–36; SPADI, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; SRQ, L’Insalata Shoulder Rating Questionnaire; SST, simple shoulder test; UCLA, University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score; WORC, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index.