Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 21;12(4):e0176186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176186

Table 1. Smear sensitivity, Xpert sensitivity and specificity, added value (Δ%) of Xpert compared to smear microscopy in MTB culture-positive samples.

Sample, n MTB culture-positive, n Smear Sensitivity, % (95% CI) Xpert Sensitivity, % (95% CI) Δ Xpert vs Smear, % (95% CI) Xpert Specificity, % (95% CI)
Total 5027 386 39.4 (34.5–44.5) 83.7 (79.6–87.2) 44.3 (39.4–49.2) 99.1 (98.7–99.3)
By sample type
Respiratory 3067 274 50.0 (43.9–56.1) 86.5 (81.9–90.3) 36.5 (30.8–42.2) 99.0 (98.6–99.4)
Non- respiratory 1960 112 13.4 (7.7–21.1) 76.8 (67.9–84.2) 63.4 (54.5–72.3) 99.1 (98.5–99.5)
By assay version
G3 863 84 84.5 (75.0–91.5) 98.8 (97.8–99.5)
G4 4164 302 83.4 (78.8–87.5) 99.1 (98.7–99.4)
In smear-negative
Total 4860 234 73.1 (66.9–78.7) 99.1 (98.8–99.3)
Respiratory 2917 137 73.0 (64.8–80.2) 99.0 (98.6–99.4)
Non-respiratory 1943 97 73.2 (63.2–81.7) 99.1 (98.6–99.5)