Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Trends Neurosci Educ. 2016 Nov 3;5(4):173–177. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2016.10.001

Figure 1. Reduced activation in discrepant and poor readers during rhyming.

Figure 1

(A) Regions of reduced activation during rhyme judgment in IQ-discrepant typical readers (TypReadHighIQ) relative to both reading-matched (ConRead) and IQ-matched (ConIQ) controls without discrepancy (green); in poor readers (RD) relative to the combined group of typically reading, non-discrepant controls (ConRead + ConIQ; cyan); and common to both comparisons (yellow). Results are height thresholded at p < .01 with a cluster significance of p < .05. The purple circle shows a region of interest (5 mm radius sphere) in the L SMG (−54, −50, 14) from a meta-analysis of RD studies [18]. (B) Parameter estimates from the L SMG ROI for each group entering into the (i) discrepancy conjunction and (ii) ConRead + ConIQ > RD contrast. Error bars show 95% confidence intervals.