Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Psychol. 2017 Feb 16;36(4):380–391. doi: 10.1037/hea0000460

Table 1.

Study 1 Weighted Mean (SD) by Experimental Condition

SA Neutral
n = 1061
SA Negative
n = 2252
NA Neutral
n = 1103
NA Negative
n = 2114

Behavior Change Plans 0.54 (0.81)A 0.35 (0.59)B 0.34 (0.61)B 0.62 (0.83)A
Intentions 3.67 (2.18) 3.74 (2.02) 3.47 (1.95) 2.70 (2.04)
Deliberative Risk Perceptions 3.50 (1.44) 3.26 (1.29) 3.23 (1.13) 3.32 (1.37)
Affective Risk Perceptions 2.12 (1.37) 2.19 (1.50) 1.98 (1.13) 2.14 (1.37)
Experiential Risk Perceptions5 3.21 (1.90) 2.89 (1.65) 2.61 (1.56) 2.60 (1.70)
Essay Word Count6 52.8 (42.1) 48.2 (41) 38.4 (31.2) 29.2 (25.4)
Self-affirmation Rating5 2.52 (1.29)A 1.76 (1.08)B 1.06 (0.50)C 1.03 (0.60)C
Positivity Rating 3.35 (1.44) 2.76 (1.43) 2.75 (1.41) 2.61 (1.45)

Note: SA = Self-affirmation Condition; NA = No-affirmation condition; Shared letter subscripts in each row are not significantly different (p < .05) and are provided only for outcomes with a significant interaction.

1

Data were missing from 1 participant for experiential risk perceptions.

2

Data were missing from 3 participants for intentions and 3 participants for affective risk perceptions

3

Data were missing from 2 participants for experiential risk perceptions and 2 participants for experiential risk perceptions

4

Data were missing from 6 participants for intentions and 2 participants for affective risk perceptions

5

Significant main effects with SA > NA.

6

Significant main effects with Neutral > Negative.