Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 12;5(4):apps.1600157. doi: 10.3732/apps.1600157

Table 2.

Results of initial screening of 21 polymorphic loci identified in eight populations of Stipa breviflora.a

Wulate (N = 12) Jungar (N = 12) Gaolan (N = 12) Hainan (N = 12) Alxa (N = 12) Chifeng (N = 12) Pulan (N = 12) Hejing (N = 12) Total Mean
Locus A Ho Heb A Ho Heb A Ho Heb A Ho Heb A Ho Heb A Ho Heb A Ho Heb A Ho Heb A Ho He
SB13 4 0.08 0.57*** 3 0.08 0.54** 4 0.17 0.68*** 3 0.00 0.50*** 4 0.167 0.413* 2 0.083 0.080 1 0.000 0.000M 3 0.083 0.434** 7 0.083 0.401
SB16 5 0.83 0.68 5 0.73 0.75 6 0.67 0.74 6 0.83 0.78 5 0.583 0.774 3 0.500 0.403 3 1.000 0.622** 2 0.917 0.497* 5 0.758 0.655
SB21 3 0.75 0.66*** 4 0.67 0.69*** 4 0.75 0.69* 4 0.55 0.67* 4 0.667 0.705** 5 0.833 0.694** 2 1.000 0.500** 3 1.000 0.594** 2 0.777 0.649
SB32 7 0.67 0.75 6 0.17 0.70*** 8 0.75 0.75 11 0.67 0.81 5 0.333 0.722*** 8 0.583 0.757* 3 0.182 0.169 3 0.455 0.517 22 0.475 0.647
SB35 4 0.17 0.66*** 10 0.08 0.87*** 8 0.33 0.81*** 11 0.42 0.85*** 9 0.455 0.855*** 6 0.167 0.656*** 3 0.167 0.156 5 0.083 0.698*** 18 0.234 0.695
SB40 7 0.33 0.72*** 8 0.25 0.78*** 4 0.25 0.52** 4 0.00 0.65*** 6 0.083 0.726*** 6 0.273 0.653*** 3 0.167 0.288 5 0.083 0.649*** 13 0.180 0.623
SB42 7 0.25 0.77*** 6 0.00 0.78*** 7 0.25 0.78*** 5 0.17 0.72*** 5 0.000 0.736*** 5 0.417 0.476 2 0.091 0.087 5 0.333 0.747*** 15 0.188 0.636
SB43 3 0.25 0.34 6 0.33 0.48** 6 0.83 0.70 7 0.75 0.62 3 0.167 0.156 2 0.333 0.278 2 0.083 0.080 6 0.583 0.569 12 0.417 0.403
SB45 2 0.91 0.50* 2 0.75 0.47 2 1.00 0.50** 2 0.42 0.33 2 0.583 0.413 2 0.750 0.469 2 1.000 0.500** 2 0.083 0.080 11 0.687 0.407
SB46 11 0.67 0.88* 9 0.50 0.80*** 9 0.75 0.71 11 1.00 0.87 7 0.667 0.781 4 0.750 0.538 5 0.917 0.625 4 0.917 0.628 10 0.771 0.729
SB49 8 0.33 0.82*** 6 0.25 0.65*** 5 0.36 0.74* 8 0.42 0.84*** 8 0.250 0.844*** 4 0.250 0.538** 3 0.250 0.226 3 0.167 0.635*** 6 0.285 0.661
SB50 7 0.73 0.79 7 0.92 0.69 5 0.92 0.76 6 0.75 0.73* 9 0.750 0.712 5 0.833 0.642 3 0.833 0.542 4 1.000 0.677 8 0.841 0.692
SB52 8 0.67 0.73 7 0.83 0.79 7 0.92 0.80 9 0.75 0.77 6 0.917 0.792 7 0.667 0.701 4 0.583 0.451 5 0.833 0.632 17 0.771 0.708
SB53 7 0.92 0.81* 4 0.83 0.64 5 0.92 0.74 6 0.82 0.76** 6 0.818 0.814 6 0.917 0.819** 3 0.333 0.288 7 0.917 0.799** 20 0.809 0.709
SB54 8 0.83 0.74 5 1.00 0.67 6 1.00 0.81*** 6 1.00 0.82* 8 0.833 0.774 7 1.000 0.722** 5 1.000 0.628* 2 1.000 0.500** 16 0.958 0.708
SB55 5 0.92 0.70 4 1.00 0.73 5 0.83 0.67 6 0.58 0.69 5 0.833 0.667 5 1.000 0.704 1 0.000 0.000M 3 1.000 0.611** 12 0.771 0.596
SB57 9 0.75 0.82 7 0.42 0.48 9 0.67 0.84* 9 0.73 0.85* 8 1.000 0.726 8 0.583 0.698* 4 0.333 0.295 7 0.500 0.663* 11 0.622 0.671
SB77 5 0.58 0.63 5 0.73 0.73 5 0.75 0.60 6 0.92 0.78 6 0.833 0.688 4 0.917 0.705 3 0.833 0.517 3 0.917 0.538* 19 0.810 0.647
SB78 4 0.27 0.68** 5 0.08 0.57*** 2 0.17 0.15 6 0.08 0.72*** 4 0.000 0.514 4 0.083 0.295** 2 0.083 0.080 2 0.000 0.153* 11 0.097 0.396
SB79 8 0.67 0.83 4 0.92 0.74 7 0.92 0.80 13 1.00 0.85 10 0.917 0.837 8 0.917 0.753* 3 0.833 0.517 3 1.000 0.580* 18 0.896 0.738
SB81 6 0.42 0.64* 8 0.33 0.82*** 8 0.67 0.67 14 0.92 0.90 7 0.583 0.778 7 0.583 0.705 7 0.545 0.459 6 0.417 0.476 24 0.558 0.681

Note: A = total number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; N = total number of samples analyzed.

a

Locality information is provided in Appendix 1.

b

Asterisks indicate significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001); M = monomorphic.