Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 22;8(13):21526–21538. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15630

Table 5. Correlation between expression of MMP9 and clinicopathological parameters in Kazakh esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) tissues.

Variable Cases (N) MMP9 low expression MMP9 high expression X2 P
0/1+(%) 2+/3+(%)
Age (y)
 ≤ Median (58y) 53 30 (56.6%) 23 (43.4%) 5.178 0.023*
 > Median 47 15 (31.9%) 32 (68.1%)
Gender
 Male 68 30 (44.1%) 38 (55.9%) 0.002 0.966
 Femle 32 15 (46.9%) 17 (53.1%)
Tumor location
 Upper 2 2 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 2.597 0.273
 Middle 70 30 (42.9%) 40 (57.1%)
 Lower 28 13 (46.4%) 15 (53.6%)
Histologic grade
 Well 29 10 (34.5 %) 19 (65.5%) 2.699 0.259
 Moderate 47 25 (53.2%) 22 (46.8%)
 poor 24 10 (41.7%) 14 (58.3%)
Depth of invasion
 TI–T2 35 21 (60.0%) 14 (40.0%) 4.007 0.045*
 T3–T4 65 24 (36.9%) 41 (63.1%)
Nodal status
 pN− 51 32 (62.7%) 19 (37.7%) 11.819 0.001*
 pN+ 49 13 (26.5%) 36 (73.5%)
Clinical stage
 I–II 62 37 (59.7%) 25 (40.3%) 12.684 0.000*
 III–IV 38 8 (21.8%) 30 (78.9%)

Abbreviations: pN, no lymph node metastasis; pN+: node metastasis. *P < 0.05.