Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2017 Jan 31;123(9):1610–1616. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30494

Table 3.

Patient ranked topics by proportion. The only significant cut off point found by the patient quantitative analysis occurred between #2 and #8 (OR: 2.8, 90% CI: (1.22, 7.32), p=0.03) and the next highest odds ratio occurred between #9 and #17 (OR: 1.75, 90% CI: (0.92, 3.44), p=0.16). Cut off points denoted by line.

Topic Proportion
#6 0.879
#2 0.879

#8 0.712
#7 0.682
#1 0.636
#10 0.561
#15 0.53
#11 0.455
#4 0.439
#16 0.424
#3 0.424
#9 0.379

#17 0.242
#5 0.242
#13 0.167
#18 0.121
#14 0.121
#12 0.106