Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2017 Jan 13;123(9):1590–1596. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30526

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Analysis of Bortezomib Utilization

Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Independent Variables aOR 95% CI Wald x2 aOR 95% CI Wald x2 aOR 95% CI Wald x2
Race
 White Ref Ref Ref
 Black 0.76 0.69–0.83 34.74*** 0.70 0.64–0.77 50.61*** 0.79 0.72–0.88 19.17***
Sex
 Male Ref Ref Ref
 Female 0.88 0.83–0.94 13.31** 0.95 0.89–1.02 1.72 0.98 0.91–1.05 0.36
Year of Diagnosis (per year) 1.19 1.17–1.20 655.75*** 1.21 1.19–1.23 724.01*** 1.21 1.19–1.23 696.60***
Age (per year) 0.93 0.92–0.93 820.05*** 0.92 0.92–0.93 808.99***
Performance Status
 Normal Ref Ref
 Poor 0.63 0.57–0.70 81.70*** 0.65 0.59–0.72 68.21***
CCI (per comorbidity) 0.89 0.87–0.92 69.32*** 0.90 0.88–0.93 55.56***
MHI (per $10,000) 1.05 1.04–1.07 42.40***
Medicaid
 No Ref
 Yes 0.77 0.69–0.86 21.41***
Urban/Rural Status
 Metro Ref
 Urban 0.98 0.89–1.09 0.10
 Rural 0.78 0.60–1.00 3.71

Wald x2 706.78(3)*** 1721.01(6) *** 1733.10(10) ***
R2 0.06 0.1663 0.1722
Change in R2 0.10 0.01

Note: Model 1= Demographic Variables; Model 2= Demographic & Overall Health Variables; Model 3= Demographics, Overall Health, & Access Barrier Variables; CCI= Charlson Comorbidity Index; MHI= Median Household Income; Ref = Reference;

*

= p < 0.01;

**

= p < 0.001;

***

= p < 0.0001.