Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Feb 28;174:98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.02.002

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The comparison of the connectivity of the DLPFC and the orbital medial prefrontal cortex (OMPFC) between active and sham-TMS (A). The connectivity of DLPFC (−42, 34, 30) and OMPFC (−39, 45, −9) (B). The bar graph shows the mean functional connectivity (FC) in sham and active TMS treatment. * p<.05, **p<.01