Table 3.
Outcomes Regarding Professionals’ Reported Level of Implementation on the AIEC (n = 30)
| T0 (Baseline) | T1 (Follow-up) | Change | Improvement T1 – T0 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIEC | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Z* | p-value | ES |
| Total score | 46.5 (15.6) | 57.4 (9.6) | 10.8 (12.9) | −4.97 | <0.001 | 0.71 |
| Organization | 51.3 (16.4) | 57.9 (9.7) | 6.6 (14.7) | −2.71 | 0.007 | 0.39 |
| Community | 46.6 (17.7) | 55.6 (14.2) | 8.9 (19.5) | −2.95 | 0.003 | 0.42 |
| Self-management | 42.5 (17.7) | 55.4 (13.4) | 12.9 (17.0) | −4.48 | <0.001 | 0.64 |
| Decision | 40.8 (17.7) | 48.1 (13.0) | 7.2 (17.5) | −2.86 | 0.004 | 0.41 |
| Delivery | 51.9 (17.7) | 63.1 (10.9) | 11.2 (17.3) | −4.17 | <0.001 | 0.60 |
| Information systems | 44.5 (16.4) | 57.1 (12.9) | 12.6 (17.5) | −4.41 | <0.001 | 0.63 |
| Integration | 44.5 (21.0) | 59.8 (13.8) | 15.3 (20.4) | −4.34 | <0.001 | 0.62 |
AIEC = Assessment of Integrated Elderly Care; scores: 0–24, limited support for integrated elderly care; 25–49, basic support for integrated elderly care; 50–74, reasonably good support for integrated elderly care; ≥75, fully developed integrated elderly care
*Wilcoxon signed-rank test
ES = effect size r; thresholds: < 0.1 trivial, ≥ 0.1–0.3 small, ≥ 0.3–0.5 medium, ≥ 0.5 large