Skip to main content
. 2005 Jan;43(1):499–501. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.1.499-501.2005

TABLE 1.

Comparison of the GLABRATA RTT test (RTT) and the dipstick test, described by Peltroche-Llacsahuanga et al. (DT) for the rapid identification of Candida glabrata

Parametera No. of strains tested No. of strains identified as C. glabratab
Chromagar Candida
Candida ID
SAB 4%
SAB 2%
Blood agar
RTT DT RTT DT RTT DT RTT DT RTT DT
C. glabrata 90 87 61 86 88 82 81 87 82 84 86
Non-C. glabrata 242 1 28 5 77 1 26 4 34 39 103
Sensitivity (%) 96.7 67.8 95.6 97.8 91.1 90 96.7 91.1 93.3 95.6
Specificity (%) 99.6 88.4 97.9 68.2 99.6 89.3 98.3 86.0 83.9 57.4
PPV (%) 98.9 68.5 94.5 53.3 98.8 75.7 95.6 70.7 68.3 45.5
NPV (%) 98.8 88.1 98.3 98.8 96.4 96.2 98.8 96.7 97.1 97.2
Efficiency (%) 98.8 82.8 97.3 76.2 97.3 89.5 97.9 87.4 86.5 67.8
a

PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.

b

SAB, Sabouraud with 4 or 2% glucose.