Skip to main content
. 2005 Jan;43(1):314–320. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.1.314-320.2005

TABLE 2.

Comparison of the discriminatory power of various genetic markers to type M. tuberculosis strains from Hong Kong

Strains typed (n) Typing method Total no. of type patterns No. of unique types (%) No. of clusters No. of clustered isolates (%) Maximum no. of isolates in a cluster Average cluster size HGI Ha
All strains (69)c Spoligo (43 spacers) 19 16 (23) 3 53 (77) 49 17.7 0.498 NAd
Spoligo (5 spacers) 5 0 (0) 5 69 (100) 49 13.8 0.467 NA
Spoligo (48 spacers) 21 17 (25) 4 52 (75) 44 13.0 0.593 NA
ETR VNTR (5 loci) 22 13 (19) 9 56 (81) 35 6.2 0.738 0.285
MIRU VNTR (5 loci) 21 12 (17) 9 57 (83) 27 6.3 0.829 0.350
MIRU VNTR (7 loci) 30 21 (30) 9 48 (70) 25 5.3 0.861 0.411
QUB VNTR (4 loci) 36 24 (35) 12 45 (65) 16 3.8 0.937 0.532
VNTR of all locib 57 50 (72) 7 19 (28) 6 2.7 0.990 0.377
IS6110 RFLP 65 62 (90) 3 7 (10) 3 2.3 0.998 NA
Beijing family strains (51) Spoligo (43 spacers) 3 2 (4) 1 49 (96) 49 49 0.078 NA
Spoligo (5 spacers) 3 0 (0) 3 51 (100) 45 17 0.218 NA
Spoligo (48 spacers) 5 3 (6) 2 48 (94) 44 24 0.253 NA
ETR VNTR (5 loci) 12 8 (16) 4 43 (84) 35 10.8 0.528 0.117
MIRU VNTR (5 loci) 13 7 (14) 6 44 (86) 27 7.3 0.705 0.192
MIRU VNTR (7 loci) 21 14 (27) 7 37 (73) 13 5.3 0.905 0.196
QUB VNTR (4 loci) 20 10 (20) 10 41 (80) 16 4.1 0.886 0.383
VNTR of all locib 39 32 (63) 7 19 (37) 6 2.7 0.982 0.218
IS6110 RFLP 48 46 (90) 2 5 (10) 3 2.5 0.997 NA
a

The mean allelic diversity (H) is the average of the allelic diversity values of the according loci.

b

Combined result of ETR, MIRU (5 non-overlapping loci) and QUB.

c

Fifty-one strains belonged to the Beijing family, and 18 strains were non-Beijing family strains.

d

NA, not applicable.