Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 18.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2017 Feb 3;135(16):1494–1505. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025505

Table 4.

Association between baseline hs-cTnT and myocardial scar at follow-up, among those with gadolinium-enhanced CMR at follow-up (N=1723)

hs-cTnT category (ng/L)* Unadjusted Age, sex, race + risk factors, LV mass, and LVEF
<LOD Reference Reference Reference
3.0–3.97 1.68 (0.75, 3.77) 1.31 (0.57, 3.02) 1.29 (0.54, 3.09)
3.98–5.32 2.67 (1.30, 5.48) 1.86 (0.88, 3.95) 1.77 (0.80, 3.88)
5.33–7.41 5.34 (2.85, 10.02) 3.31 (1.68, 6.54) 2.49 (1.20, 5.15)
≥7.42 6.68 (3.63, 12.28) 3.26 (1.63, 6.51) 2.41 (1.15, 5.06)
Test for trend <.001 <.001 .007
ln(hs-cTnT) 2.77 (2.11, 3.63) 1.87 (1.38, 2.54) 1.57 (1.12, 2.17)
*

Categories based on distribution of hs-cTnT among those with gadolinium-enhanced-CMR at visit 5

SBP, DBP, anti-hypertensive medications, diabetes (normal/DM), smoking, lipids, height, weight, and estimated GFR.

Cell Values represent Odds Ratios and 95% CI