Table 4.
Model | Variable | R 2 | B | 95% CI | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||||
Change in OKS | Excellent | 0.38 | Reference | |||
Very good | −2.51 | −3.30 | −1.72 | <0.001 | ||
Good | −5.51 | −6.48 | −4.53 | <0.001 | ||
Fair | −8.92 | −10.26 | −7.57 | <0.001 | ||
Poor | −10.13 | −11.98 | −8.27 | <0.001 | ||
Change in SF-12 PCS | Excellent | 0.44 | Reference | |||
Very good | −2.13 | −3.00 | −1.72 | <0.001 | ||
Good | −4.93 | −6.00 | −3.97 | <0.001 | ||
Fair | −6.53 | −8.00 | −5.07 | <0.001 | ||
Poor | −5.92 | −8.00 | −3.84 | <0.001 | ||
Change in SF-12 MCS | Excellent | 0.59 | Reference | |||
Very good | −1.18 | −2.02 | −034 | 0.006 | ||
Good | −3.21 | −4.30 | −2.13 | <0.001 | ||
Fair | −6.33 | −7.79 | 4.86 | <0.001 | ||
Poor | −5.82 | −7.81 | −3.82 | <0.001 |
All variables (in Table 1) were entered into each model using “enter” methodology