Table 3.
Fish‡ | Servings/wk Median |
Multivariate HR (95% CI) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Almost never | 1–3 servings/mo | 1 serving/wk | 2–4 servings/wk | ≥ 5 servings/wk | p trend | ||
Intermediate AMD | |||||||
Canned tuna | 0.70 | 1 (ref) | 0.94 (0.83,1.07) | 0.84 (0.73, 0.96) | 0.68 (0.44,1.05) | 0.005 | |
Dark fish | 0.20 | 1 (ref) | 1.08 (0.91,1.27) | 0.92 (0.74, 1.14) | 0.74 | ||
Other fisha | 0.58 | 1 (ref) | 0.96 (0.85,1.09) | 0.91 (0.79, 1.05) | 0.91 (0.45,1.83) | 0.25 | |
Total fatty fishb | 0.98 | 1 (ref) | 0.92 (0.80,1.06) | 0.95 (0.82,1.10) | 0.79 (0.65,0.96) | 0.61 (0.46,0.81) | <.001 |
Advanced AMD | |||||||
Canned tuna | 0.70 | 1 (ref) | 1.10 (0.96,1.26) | 1.00 (0.86,1.16) | 0.76 (0.46,1.23) | 0.34 | |
Dark fish | 0.20 | 1 (ref) | 1.04 (0.87,1.24) | 0.98 (0.78,1.23) | 0.97 | ||
Other fisha | 0.58 | 1 (ref) | 1.08 (0.94,1.23) | 1.04 (0.89,1.22) | 1.00 (0.44,2.24) | 0.63 | |
Total fatty fishb | 0.98 | 1 (ref) | 1.10 (0.94,1.29) | 1.05 (0.90,1.24) | 0.99 (0.80,1.22) | 0.80 (0.59,1.08) | 0.11 |
Multivariate models were adjusted for the same variable as in Table 2
Other fish were mainly white fish
Total fatty fish was the sum of canned tuna and dark fish. Finer intake categories were created to show detailed associations