Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 24;7:46524. doi: 10.1038/srep46524

Table 1. Comparison of demographic data between the combined chemotherapy intervention group with Chinese traditional medicine and the chemotherapy alone control group before enrollment in the intention-to-treat population.

Characteristic Intervention group (n = 156) Control group (n = 158) P-value
Age
 Median (years) 58.9 (39–77) 59.1 (36–78)  
 <65 (%) 122 (78.21) 121 (76.58) 0.731
 ≥65 (%) 34 (21.79) 37 (23.42)  
Sex- n (%)
 Male 95 (60.90) 99 (62.66) 0.748
 Female 61 (39.10) 59 (37.34)  
Disease stages at entry - n (%)
 IB 69 (44.23) 70 (44.30) 0.971
 IIA 21 (13.46) 23 (14.56)  
 IIB 15 (9.62) 13 (8.23)  
 IIIA 51 (32.69) 52 (32.91)  
Histology - n (%)
 Squamous carcinoma 40 (25.64) 39 (24.68) 0.726
 Adenocarcinoma 112 (71.79) 110 (69.62)  
 Adenosquamous carcinoma 3 (1.92) 7 (4.43)  
 Large cell carcinoma and others 1 (0.64) 2 (1.26)  
ECOG PS - n (%)
 0 2 (1.3) 3 (1.9) 0.330
 1 152 (97.4) 155 (98.1)  
 2 2 (1.3) 0 (0.00)  

Date are n (%) or median (range) for all patients with confirmed disease who received at least one cycle of the study drug. ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PS = performance status.