Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 3;114(16):E3215–E3223. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620987114

Table 1.

Predicted and observed masses for cluster-bound forms of FNR

FNR species Predicted mass (Da)* Average observed mass (Da) ΔMass (Da)
Monomeric FNR
 [4Fe-4S]2+ 29,897 29,898 +1
 [3Fe-4S]1+ 29,842 29,843 +1
 [3Fe-3S]3+ 29,808 29,811 +3
 [3Fe-3S]1+ 29,810 29,811 +1
 [2Fe-4S]2+ 29,785 29,784 −1
 [2Fe-3S]2+ 29,753 29,752 −1
 [2Fe-2S]2+ 29,721 29,720 −1
Dimeric FNR
 [4Fe-4S]2+/[4Fe-4S]2+ 59,794 59,796 +2
 [4Fe-4S]2+/[3Fe-4S]1+ 59,739 59,740 +1
 [3Fe-4S]1+/[3Fe-4S]1+ 59,684 59,685 +1
 [3Fe-3S]3+/[3Fe-4S]1+ 59,650 59,653 +3
 [3Fe-3S]1+/[3Fe-4S]1+ 59,652 59,653 +1
*

The difference in predicted mass depending on the overall charge on the cluster is caused by charge compensation of cluster binding. A lower overall cluster charge would result in more protons remaining bound and consequently, a higher mass (26, 34).

The average observed mass is derived from at least four independent experiments, with SD of ±1 Da.

The difference between the average observed and predicted masses.