Table 2.
Comparison of the K-values for the test and ancestral mutualistic consortia
Experiment | aMutualistic consortium | b P |
---|---|---|
Evolution experiment | A1 | 0.0013 |
A2 | 0.0013 | |
A3 | 0.0013 | |
A4 | 0.0013 | |
A6 | 0.0013 | |
A7 | 0.0021 | |
A8 | 0.0013 | |
B1 | 0.0003 | |
B2 | 0.0003 | |
B7 | 0.0004 | |
c,dCrossing experiment | Panc + Tevol,a | 0.015 |
(mutualistic consortium B2) | Panc + Tevol,b | 0.028 |
Pevol + Tanc | 0.17 | |
Pevol + Tevol,a | 0.0002 | |
Pevol + Tevol,b | 0.0009 | |
Pevol + Tevol,a + Tevol,b | 0.0002 |
aOnly those consortia that avoided extinction were analyzed. bBold font: statistically significant differences between the test and ancestral mutualistic consortia (P < 0.01). cDefinitions: Panc, ancestral strain of BW25113 (∆proC); Tanc, ancestral strain of BW25113 (∆trpC); Pevol, evolved strain of BW25113 (∆proC); Tevol,a, evolved strain of BW25113 (∆trpC); Tevol,b, evolved strain of BW25113 (∆trpC). dTevol,a and Tevol,b are two genetically different strains of BW25113 (∆trpC) that emerged within the B2 mutualistic consortium