Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 10;13(4):e1005485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005485

Table 6. Fragment modeling and docking accuracy for 9-residue IDR complexes from ELM.

Bound PDB ID First res Minimum RMSD (Å) Unbound PDB ID Minimum RMSD (Å)
Fragments All docked Selected docked All docked Selected docked
1jsuAB 25 1.8 3.5 3.5 2c5nAB 3.2 3.2
1jsuAB 34 1.4 2.8 9.5 2c5nAB 3.2 9.2
1jsuAB 43 0.5 1.6 1.9 2c5nAB 1.6 2.6
1jsuAB 52 0.6 1.6 3.1 2c5nAB 3.1 3.1
1o6lA 4 2.1 3.9 3.9 1gzkA 3.6 4.6
1o6lA 469 2.9 5.1 5.7 1gzkA 5.5 5.5
1s70A 1 1.3 3.5 9.1 4ut2A 3.5 8.3
1s70A 10 0.4 3.1 3.1 4ut2A 2.6 2.6
1s70A 22 2.4 3.6 7.5 4ut2A 3.3 5.8
1s70A 31 1.6 3.8 4.1 4ut2A 3.3 4.5
2w84A 101 0.4 2.8 2.8 5aonA 2.0 2.0
Average 1.4 3.2 4.9 3.2 4.7

First res.: The first amino acid position of the 9-residue long fragments in the protein. Fragments: minimum backbone RMSD of predicted fragments to native. All docked: minimum L-RMSD of all docked fragments (has a lower bound of the fragment RMSD). Selected docked: minimum L-RMSD of top 4,500 fragments by DI score (Z(DFIRE) + Z(ITScorePro)).