Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 23;13(3):1681–1687. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.5630

Table I.

Effect of vorinostat on the expression of CD146 in clinical tumor samples.

Time course, h

Patients Clinical diagnosis Classification 0 3 6 12
Patient 1 Ovarian cancer Serous 1 76.40±7.25 16.33±2.78 15.97±1.64
Patient 2 Ovarian cancer Mucinous 1 77.13±6.65 14.02±2.45 13.23±1.76
Patient 3 Ovarian cancer Serous 1 80.52±7.81 18.59±2.97 17.13±2.35
Patient 4 Ovarian cancer Serous 1 54.21±4.36 15.47±3.75 11.24±1.88
Patient 5 Ovarian cancer Mucinous 1 73.26±6.82 21.67±1.98 20.57±1.18
Patient 6 Ovarian cancer Serous 1 103.42±8.93 46.15±2.60 37.22±2.71
Patient 7 Ovarian cancer Serous 1 66.57±5.33 50.14±3.08 26.89±3.43
Patient 8 Ovarian cancer Serous 1 90.36±7.47 65.11±4.23 30.78±3.59

Data are expressed as fold increase (mean ± standard error) of CD146 messenger RNA from vorinostat-treated ovarian cancer cells relative to that from medium-treated cells. Each data point was obtained from ≥3 independent experiments. CD146, cluster of differentiation 146.