Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 23;13(3):1688–1694. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.5631

Table II.

Association of various candidate prognostic factors with overall survival of 180 glioma patients, as evaluated by Cox regression analysis.

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


Variable Groups Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value
Age, years <50 vs. ≥50 1.082 (0.568–1.966) NS
Gender Male vs. female 1.021 (0.553–1.922) NS
Tumor size, cm <5 vs. ≥5 1.168 (0.689–2.139) NS
Tumor location Supratentorial vs. subtentorial 1.026 (0.581–1.938) NS
Karnofsky performance scale <90 vs. ≥90 2.689 (1.291–5.693) 0.010 2.043 (0.896–4.338) 0.030
WHO grade I–II vs. III–IV 3.625 (1.673–7.932) <0.001 3.267 (1.392–6.581) 0.001
Tumor recurrence Absent vs. present 2.018 (0.819–3.983) NS
LKB1 expression Absent vs. present 3.348 (1.397–7.026) <0.001 3.022 (1.002–6.016) 0.001

WHO, World Health Organization; LKB1, liver kinase B1; NS, no significance; CI, confidence interval.