Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Chem. 2016 Oct 26;38(15):1238–1251. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24522

Table 2.

Comparison of experimental and computed free energy difference for the ACK1 inhibitors.

Parent cmpd/Transformation ΔΔGexp ΔΔGFEPa ΔΔGSSFEPb ΔΔGLGFEc ΔΔGLGFEd
L1/1➔2 1.28 1.97±0.40 3.00±0.22 0.57±0.32 1.09
L1/2➔3 2.71 −1.02±0.18 4.32±1.20 2.17±0.32 2.25
L1/1➔3 3.98 0.96±0.51 7.32±1.18 2.74±0.53 3.33
L2/4➔5e −3.76 1.29±1.58 4.53±3.21 1.25±1.66 0.74
L3/6➔7 −0.95 0.93±0.19 0.37±0.54 −0.91±0.11 −0.75
L4/8➔9 −0.87 0.77±0.29 2.00±0.99 −0.56±0.42 −0.74
L5/10➔11 0.57 0.45±0.34 0.17±1.47 0.55±0.31 0.50
L5/10➔12 0.11 0.60±0.22 2.22±0.84 −0.11±0.26 −0.03

R2 0.11 0.18 0.33 0.52
PI −0.25 0.27 0.52 0.60
RMSD 2.63 3.54 1.86 1.62
AAD 2.08 2.71 1.01 0.79

Omit Outliere R2 0.05 0.78 0.98 1.00
PI 0.06 0.85 1.00 0.99
RMSD 2.07 2.11 0.59 0.33
AAD 1.65 1.90 0.44 0.26
a

Average and standard deviations (n=3) from the standard FEP calculations.

b

Average and standard deviations (n=5) from the single-step FEP calculations.

c

Average and standard deviations (n=5) from the MC SILCS/LGFE calculations.

d

Minimum energy conformation from the MC SILCS/LGFE calculations.

e

L2/4➔5 (2H to 2Cl)outlier omitted from the second statistical analysis.