Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Chem. 2016 Dec 23;38(15):1198–1208. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24668

Table 2.

Data to calculate the free energy difference (ΔG1,A→B) between the closed and open states of β-cyclodextrin in water by connecting the free energy surface in vacuum to that in water with both free energy calculations and endpoint methods. The times required to compute ΔG0,A→B, kT ln (P0,a1A/P1,a1A), and kT ln (P0,b1B/P1,b1B) were significantly smaller than the times required to compute ΔG1,A→B, ΔG0→1,a1, and ΔG0→1,b1, as can be seen by observing the small sizes of the error bars on the first set of quantities. The time required to compute ΔG1,A→B was therefore dominated by the calculations of ΔG0→1,a1 and ΔG0→1,b1. The values for ΔG0,A→B, kT ln (P0,a1A/P1,a1A), and kT ln (P0,b1B/P1,b1B) are common between TI and the endpoint method. The computation time for each of ΔG0→1,a1 and ΔG0→1,b1 in the endpoint method corresponds to that for a single λ for TI.

Equation 1 Equation 2
TI
Equation 2
free energy functional/end point methods
ΔG1,A→B 1.0±0.1 1.0±0.8 1.2±0.2
ΔG0,A→B 3.12874 ±0.00007
kT ln (P0,a1A/P1,a1A)
−0.393±0.002
ΔG0→1,a1 −56.4±0.3 −46.6±0.1
kT ln (P0,b1B/P1,b1B)
−0.35±0.01
ΔG0→1,b1 −58.5±0.5 −48.5±0.1
Simulation time (ns) ~200 ~200 ~8